top
Palestine
Palestine
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Isaeli Apartheid and Boycotts

by Repost - Guardian
The current defeat of the puny attempt to boycott Israel academics is a victory for the boycott movement. English academia was a weak link in the anti-South Africa apartheid movement as well and the recent effort was seen by many as a mere token effort bound to fail.

In the meantime, the anti-Israel boycott/sanction effort is fully supported by the United Nations: The UN itself has declared that Zionism is Racism. In the meantime, the boycott/sanction movement continues to spread throughout the globe.

> By Ronnie Kasrils and Victoria Brittain
>
> The Guardian
> 25 May 2005
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1491645,00.html
>
> Last October, 13-year-old Iman al-Hams was shot and wounded by an
Israeli army unit in the southern Gaza Strip town of Rafah, despite
being identified as a little girl, and wearing a school uniform. Iman
was machine-gunned by the unit's commander. She had 17 bullets in her
body, and three in her head, a Palestinian doctor told the Guardian.
Iman is one of 654 Palestinian children to have been killed in the
occupied territories since September 2000. Several were killed as
they sat at their desks in class. Three and a half thousand children
have been wounded. Over 300 are in Israeli prisons.
>
> In South Africa's state of emergency of the mid-1980s, declared in
response to a nationwide campaign of protest, 312 children were
killed, over 1,000 wounded, 2,000 children under 16 were detained
without trial, thousands more arrested, hundreds fled into exile, and
a generation was marked for life. The Rev Desmond Tutu wrote about
one child, Johnny, whom he saw after some time in police custody: "I
wanted to cry, I was filled with a blazing anger against a system
that could do this to a child ... Johnny's case alone ought to be
enough to fill any decent person ... with revulsion and indignation."
>
> Iman's is such a case, 20 years on. Archbishop Tutu has described
the situation of the Palestinians under occupation as worse than
South Africa under apartheid. In July 2004, the international court
of justice ruled that Israel's 280 mile wall, the latest burden on
Palestinians, was illegal. But Israel, like the old South Africa
faced with international disapproval, simply ignored it.
>
> Twenty years ago, 496 British academics responded to an appeal from
the African National Congress leaders in exile after two academics
were served with banning orders. They signed a letter calling for an
academic boycott of South Africa. Today, some in the new generation
of British academics feel they cannot accept Israel's occupation of
East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, the policies that brought the
wall, and a new generation of children suffering like those South
African children whose wounds of mind and body never healed.
>
> Iman and Johnny will never go to college. But some of the Israeli
soldiers implicated in crimes like the one that killed the little
girl are university lecturers who serve in the occupation army
reserve forces every year, and who otherwise go about their
academic "business as usual" for the rest of the year. No Israeli
academic institution has ever severed its organic ties with the
military-security establishment in protest. None has issued a public
statement condemning the grave violations of Palestinian human
rights. This is part of the reason why Palestinians have called upon
the world to boycott Israeli academic institutions.
>
> The volcanic political response to the decision by the Association
of University Teachers (AUT) in Britain to impose an academic boycott
on Israeli universities has dismissed the crucial comparison between
Israel and South Africa, which was the main motive behind the
Palestinians' call for boycott. Israeli universities are not being
targeted for boycott because of their ethnic or religious identity,
but solely because of their complicity in the Israeli system of
apartheid, which many see as sufficiently analogous to its defunct
predecessor in South Africa to warrant sanctions.
>
> In the occupied territories, Israel maintains a strict racial and
colonial segregation between Israeli Jewish settlers and the native
Palestinians (Muslims and Christians). The former group enjoys
economic benefits, special roads, heavily subsidised and more heavily
protected housing, and full political rights. Even under apartheid
there were never whites-only roads. There was never a comparable
prolonged siege, or curfews, that cut off black people from each
other. Palestinians, on the other hand, are under a military
occupation that kills and destroys, but also continuously
dispossesses them of their lands for the benefit of Jewish settlers.
>
> The desire for an ethnic-religious majority of Israeli Jews has
seeped across from the occupied territories to permeate the
Israeli "national" agenda, which increasingly views Palestinian
citizens of Israel as a "demographic threat", as former prime minster
Binyamin Netanyahu phrased it. The Palestinian minority in Israel has
for decades been denied basic equality in health, education, housing
and land possession, solely because it is not Jewish. The fact that
this minority is allowed to vote hardly redresses the rampant
injustice in all other basic human rights. They are excluded from the
very definition of the "Jewish state", and have virtually no
influence on the laws, or political, social and economic policies.
Hence their similarity to the black South Africans.
>
> In addition, and related to the demographic question, Israel
continues to deny Palestinian refugees, who were ethnically cleansed
during the 1948 war, their right to return to their lands and
properties. Israel bases its position, which is contrary to
fundamental human rights provisions and international law, on its
right to preserve its Jewish ethnic-religious supremacy. No other
country in the world today dares to claim any similar right.
>
> In response to all this, how many Israeli academic institutions
have criticised the racist and colonial policies of the state? How
many Israeli academics have conscientiously objected to military
service in the occupied territories? How many university lecturers
have publicly opposed the occupation and colonisation of Palestinian
land? Professors Ilan Pappe and Tanya Reinhart stand out, leading a
few Israeli academics in calling for support for the Palestinian
academics' call for selective academic boycott.
>
> The boycotts and sanctions ultimately helped liberate both blacks
and whites in South Africa. Palestinians and Israelis will similarly
benefit from this non-violent campaign that Palestinians are calling
for.
>
>
> Ronnie Kasrils is minister for intelligence in the South African
government and a former commander of Umkhonto we Sizwe, military wing
of the African National Congress. He is writing in his personal
capacity. Victoria brittain is a journalist.







by Dark Period
"The UN itself has declared that Zionism is Racism"

True, the general assembly passed this resolution in 1975. In 1991, it officially renounced that position. Even Kofi Annan calls that period a "dark time" for the UN.
by Not so dark after all



A special report to the UN written by a former member of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission has declared Israeli Apartheid in Israel to be worse than that in South Africa. Bishop Desmond Tutu has reiterated this same.
by gehrig
anonymouse: "The current defeat of the puny attempt to boycott Israel academics is a victory for the boycott movement."

And up is down, and left is right, and light is dark. And defeat is victory.

I knew that the pro-boycott folks would have to come up with some comforting illusions. I also expected them to be lame and illogical. I didn't expect them to be _that_ lame.

@%<
by not impressed by Gehrig
"IDF troops take over Palestinian family's home to watch soccer"
Haaretz.com 5/27/05
By Reuters

Israel Defense Forces soldiers barged into a Palestinian home and commandeered its television room so they could watch a soccer match, a military source said on Friday after a TV report on the incident.

Footage on Channel 10 TV showed broken furniture and windows in the room of the house in the West Bank city of Hebron where the television station said the troops watched Wednesday's Champions League final between AC Milan and Liverpool.

Palestinian teenager Anan al-Zrayer said he was walking down the street when soldiers asked him if his family had a television set and a satellite dish.

"I said 'yes,' and told them we don't have Israeli channels. (After they entered the house,) I gave them the remote control and they carried out a search. We were kicked into another room," he said.

Another Hebron resident said it was not the first time that soldiers had taken over Palestinian houses to watch television.

Khigaji al-Batch said about two weeks ago, 11 soldiers entered his home and stayed through the night.

"They are using our houses like a cinema," Batch said.


by From Happy Boycotter
<<putting the "moron" in "oxymoron"
by gehrig Friday, May. 27, 2005 at 9:49 PM

anonymouse: "The current defeat of the puny attempt to boycott Israel academics is a victory for the boycott movement." And up is down, and left is right, and light is dark. And defeat is victory. I knew that the pro-boycott folks would have to come up with some comforting illusions. I also expected them to be lame and illogical. I didn't expect them to be _that_ lame.>>

TSK, TSK MY LITTLE PANTY-WAIST,

THE CORRECT SAYING IS

"SNATCHING VICTORY FROM THE JAWS OF DEFEAT."

PS:

WHILE YOUR ON THAT 3RD RATE CAMPUS IN CHAMPAIGN URBANA, LOOK UP DAVID GREEN OF ANTI-WAR, HE'LL KICK YOUR LITTLE BUTT FOR YOU.






by boycott now
at any time, for any reason, there is blood on your hands.
by troy
you bums don't buy anything of value anyway !
you first have to be a consumer in order to boycott a product.

or are you saying that from this point you refuse to scavanage from their dumpsters (more likely to be true) It will make an impressive statement....(scoff)
by gehrig
sefarad: " I wish they can get more victories like that."

With people like JA -- still apparently unable to find his caps lock key -- on their side, how can they not?

Meanwhile, here's an interesting article about the difference between indoctrination and education.

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=581069

It's ANC folks seeing first-hand that the apartheid accusation just doesn't fly.

""At the beginning, I was fresh from the liberation movement," Gqiba said this week in an effort to explain his shift in attitude. "You come here with preconceived ideas and a preconceived mindset. Then you begin to encounter the reality of the place, with all its complexities. I hope what happened to me will happen to [the members of the ANC delegation].""

But some of you aren't interested in that, of course, because it gets in the way of your demonization of Israel. And that is why history is leaving you behind.

@%<
by gehrig
Editorial | British Professors' Boycott Tiff chills academic freedom

Academic fights don't always get publicity, especially ones that roil along shores on the other side of the Atlantic. But a recent row in Britain deserves attention from the higher education community and all who prize academic freedom.

The Association of University Teachers is the dominant higher education union in Britain. On April 22, the AUT as it's known, decided to boycott Haifa and Bar-Ilan universities in Israel and block cultural or academic cooperation, joint projects, funding and conference participation.

This extreme action was taken to show displeasure with what some in the AUT said was anti-Palestinian policies of the two universities.

After weeks of outrage expressed by numerous academic groups - including the Middle East Studies Association of North America - the AUT on Thursday reversed its decision and lifted the boycott.

That's the best possible ending to this unfortunate episode. But that the boycott ever took root points to some important issues.

The most significant is the chilling effect such actions have on academic freedom. They chill different voices expressing different opinions, which opens different lines of scholarly inquiry. A university is supposed to encourage, not squelch, diversity of thought and study.

Besides, blacklisting professors and universities is a nonsensical way to further the cause of establishing a Palestinian state. Educational exchanges can disprove assumptions and replace them with alliances among Israelis and Palestinians.

Since some of the most vocal proponents of a Palestinian state are on university faculties, targeting them could alienate potential allies.

Many of the members of the Middle East Studies Association of North America also oppose Israel's policies toward the territories. But they nonetheless saw the danger of cloaking their political opposition in professorial robes and strongly condemned the AUT's initial action.

This short-lived boycott may signal a more intensive strategy of surrounding Israel with sanctions of different types. Yet the best chance for peace is not in isolating either Palestinians or Israelis.

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon have taken small steps toward resolving this conflict. What's in order now are more, bigger steps toward a two-state solution.

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/11759167.htm

@%<
by Boycott
Funding state sponsered terrorism
by Israel: an albatross around America's neck Tuesday, Jan. 18, 2005 at 10:31 AM

http://www.wrmea.com/us_aid_to_israel/

U.S. Financial Aid To Israel: Figures, Facts, and Impact
Summary

Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid
Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997)

Foreign Aid Grants and Loans
$74,157,600,000

Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid)
$9,047,227,200

Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments
$1,650,000,000

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Total Benefits per Israeli
$14,630

Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S.
Aid to Israel

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Interest Costs Borne by U.S.
$49,936,680,000

Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers
$134,791,507,200

Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli
$23,240

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$55.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network