Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Monday Rally at Diane Feinstein's Home
"Senator Diane Feinstein came out in favor the Real ID Act, which, among other things, will deny undocumented immigrants driver's licenses at a national level. If this law passes (it has already passed the US House of Representatives and will be considered by the US Senate in the next few weeks), it will destroy our efforts to obtain driver's licenses for immigrants here in California...'
The Real ID Act is one more frightening piece of repressive legislation, aimed at gutting the human rights of both immigrants and citizens alike, in the bipartisan tradition of the Patriot Act. Among many other provisions, it would set up a national electronic identification system, and make it illegal for states to issue driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants. (More info on the Real ID Act below.)
Last week, the House of Representatives attached the Real ID Act to President Bush's bill to appropriate an additional $81 billion to his war fund. The next day, the House passed both bills, by a vote of 388-43, with the support of San Francisco's Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats' minority leader. The Real ID Act and the war appropriation now go to the Senate.
"WAKE UP CALL TO SENATOR DIANE FEINSTEIN!
"Join immigrant communities to tell Senator Diane Feinstein that we won't tolerate her denying driver's licenses to our communities. Join us for a vigil in front of Feinstein's house.
"Senator Diane Feinstein came out in favor the Real ID Act, which, among other things, will deny undocumented immigrants driver's licenses at a national level. If this law passes (it has already passed the US House of Representatives and will be considered by the US Senate in the next few weeks), it will destroy our efforts to obtain driver's licenses for immigrants here in California...
"The vigil will include speakers, music, candles, and a public display of driver's licenses on Feinstein's front lawn.
"For more information, please contact Renee Saucedo, (415) 553-3404."
WHEN:
Monday, March 21
Vigil begins at 5 PM at Feinstein's house.
(At 4 PM, there will be vehicles to transport people
from Centro del Pueblo to Feinstein's house.
Please bring your car to assist in transportation.)
WHERE:
Feinstein's house: 30 Presidio Terrace (near Arguello)
Centro del Pueblo: 474 Valencia Street (at 16th Street)
· Make it illegal for states to issue driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants.
· Expand the definitions of "terrorist" activity, by creating broad "guilt by association" standards that will prevent many immigrants and their families from gaining legal status.
· Make many procedural changes that make it much more difficult for refugees to get asylum in the US.
· Waive all environmental, labor and civil rights laws that would prevent the building of a 14-mile fence along the San Diego-Tijuana border.
· Implement new high-technology ground surveillance techniques on the border.
· Give unprecedented authority to bounty hunters to "pursue, apprehend and detain" immigrants in deportation proceedings.
One blatant example of the outright racism in the Real ID Act is a provision that requires judges to deny asylum to refugees who have a bad "demeanor." The act also bars the reversal of a judge's denial of asylum based on the lack of documentary evidence. Decisions about legal status and asylum would extend to an applicant's spouse and children, even if they are wholly innocent of the alleged wrong-doing of the applicant.
The Real ID Act's provisions go far beyond its anti-immigrant posturing. As is often the case, anti-immigrant hysteria is being used as a wedge issue to attack the rights of citizens as well.
The American Civil Liberties Union claims that the Real ID Act sets up a "de facto national ID card." The act requires that states issue driver's licenses and identification cards which include "machine-readable technology, with defined minimum data elements," including Social Security numbers. Regulations defining these requirements will be written by the Department of Homeland Security. States will be required to link their motor vehicle department databases to the feds. All applicants will be required to prove their citizenship or immigration status.
Welcome to the new USA -- the United States of Apartheid.
National Immigration Forum:
http://www.immigrationforum.org/documents/PolicyWire/Legislation/Analysis_REALIDPassed.pdf
American Immigration Lawyer's Association:
http://www.aila.org/fileViewer.aspx?docID=17718
"House backs major shift to electronic IDs," C/NET:
http://snipurl.com/cpc8
Read more:
http://www.struggle-and-win.net/
For more information:
http://www.indybay.org/immigrant
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Maybe you missed it, but Republicans are in charge of the White House, both Houses of Congress, the Supreme Court, and on and on, and, wait, what's this? Tidal wave of illegal immigration? Even though it's Ws second term with a friendly Congress and Court, I'll bet there's a way to pin it on Clinton after all.
See what even your own bigotted and xenophobic friends have to say about those in charge today and immigration at http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/tidal_wave_of_illegal_immigration.html.
What will it take to wake Bush and company up, an atomic bomb? What with all the corporate money to be made off near-slave labor, I'm not even sure that would work either.
See what even your own bigotted and xenophobic friends have to say about those in charge today and immigration at http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/tidal_wave_of_illegal_immigration.html.
What will it take to wake Bush and company up, an atomic bomb? What with all the corporate money to be made off near-slave labor, I'm not even sure that would work either.
Yeah, I don't get it. Would people want illegal immigrants to get driver's licenses? How about taking illegal immigrants and putting them back in Mexico (or wherever).
I'm a liberal in almost everything, but I'm "republican" in that I don't really feel like having my taxes pay for people who sneak into the country.
California is SCREWED economically because of the insane floods of illegals...
I'm a liberal in almost everything, but I'm "republican" in that I don't really feel like having my taxes pay for people who sneak into the country.
California is SCREWED economically because of the insane floods of illegals...
I certainly hope everyone out there who is support of unchecked, illlegal migration to the US is prepared to go public with their views. That will help in indentifying who to send the bill to when it's time to pay for the services they all use. I, for one, am tired of this state going bankrupt because of millions of uninvited invaders helping themselves to our services for free. Perhaps Mr Fox could do something about the poor in his country rather than sending them up here to get rid of the problem.
"I'm a liberal in almost everything, but I'm "republican" in that I don't really feel like having my taxes pay for people who sneak into the country."
that's the most phoney thing to say ever. who you think you foolin'? you think the left will be tricked by you into your xenophobic scapegoat march against the darker ones? get real
that's the most phoney thing to say ever. who you think you foolin'? you think the left will be tricked by you into your xenophobic scapegoat march against the darker ones? get real
I was told that food not bombs plans to be there to cater the event with a splended fair for all protesters, what a great group to do such a self less thing. we are lucky to have them with us.
Someone above said: "that's the most phoney thing to say ever. who you think you foolin'? you think the left will be tricked by you into your xenophobic scapegoat march against the darker ones? get real"
MY RESPONSE:
I don't want my tax dollars to pay for people coming into the country illegally who can barely speak english, can't function in regular society, and work under the table, so americans who actually pay taxes on their earnings go unemployed.
Can I keep my tax dollars and let you pay double for you and me, then?
I am not "against human beings." This is a country. Our tax dollars fuel the country. I don't want to pay for people who sneak into the country illegally and can't even function so they just wind up on welfare and using "free" clinics and other stuff that we normal tax-payers have to pay for.
I'm liberal in everything, but that doesn't mean I want to give my hard-earned money COMPLETELY AWAY.
MY RESPONSE:
I don't want my tax dollars to pay for people coming into the country illegally who can barely speak english, can't function in regular society, and work under the table, so americans who actually pay taxes on their earnings go unemployed.
Can I keep my tax dollars and let you pay double for you and me, then?
I am not "against human beings." This is a country. Our tax dollars fuel the country. I don't want to pay for people who sneak into the country illegally and can't even function so they just wind up on welfare and using "free" clinics and other stuff that we normal tax-payers have to pay for.
I'm liberal in everything, but that doesn't mean I want to give my hard-earned money COMPLETELY AWAY.
Someone else said: "Oh shut up. I bet your ancestors were welcomed to the U.S. with open arms. What lies do you tell yourself to make you feel better than another human."
MY RESPONSE:
My ancestors, when they immigrated to america, learned english, worked hard to excel in school, got normal jobs, and paid taxes.
Illegal immigrants from mexico barely speak english, lack education, are limited in what work they can do, usually wind up using "free" services that WE THE TAX-PAYERS pay for, and often do illegal work, and don't even pay taxes. And when they get sick and go to the hospital, we the tax payers are paying for it.
No thanks.
It isn't about "feeling better than another human." it's about REALITY. This is a COUNTRY. I work hard to earn my money. I don't like my money being taken away and given to other people who shouldn't be receiving it.
If you are so eager to give your money away, please give away double the amount, so I can give nothing. THanks
MY RESPONSE:
My ancestors, when they immigrated to america, learned english, worked hard to excel in school, got normal jobs, and paid taxes.
Illegal immigrants from mexico barely speak english, lack education, are limited in what work they can do, usually wind up using "free" services that WE THE TAX-PAYERS pay for, and often do illegal work, and don't even pay taxes. And when they get sick and go to the hospital, we the tax payers are paying for it.
No thanks.
It isn't about "feeling better than another human." it's about REALITY. This is a COUNTRY. I work hard to earn my money. I don't like my money being taken away and given to other people who shouldn't be receiving it.
If you are so eager to give your money away, please give away double the amount, so I can give nothing. THanks
-- most illegals pay taxes just like everyone else
-- illegals tend to use less gov't services than citizens out of fear of deportation and never collect on social security taxes they've paid
-- without illegal labor, you yourself would be paying *much* more at the cash register for many items you buy every day
you still ain't foolin' anyone with your phoney liberal talk. you're to the right of W with what you speak. even he knows this country runs on cheap illegal labor and wouldn't betray his corporate masters by completely cutting off the supply of below minimum wage workers. they'd have his head.
-- illegals tend to use less gov't services than citizens out of fear of deportation and never collect on social security taxes they've paid
-- without illegal labor, you yourself would be paying *much* more at the cash register for many items you buy every day
you still ain't foolin' anyone with your phoney liberal talk. you're to the right of W with what you speak. even he knows this country runs on cheap illegal labor and wouldn't betray his corporate masters by completely cutting off the supply of below minimum wage workers. they'd have his head.
European countries that are more liberal than america is have fewer illegal immigrants in them.
Not liking illegals flooding into the country isn't "proof" of being liberal or republican
Not liking illegals flooding into the country isn't "proof" of being liberal or republican
clue you in a bit wrote:
"you're to the right of W with what you speak. even he knows this country runs on cheap illegal labor and wouldn't betray his corporate masters by completely cutting off the supply of below minimum wage workers. they'd have his head."
This is correct about W's corporate masters. But guess who funds your "ally", the National Immigration Forum? Wall Street and Corporate Foundations.
The Immigration Lawyers support this for their pocketbook, they would make millions off another illegal alien amensty. They don't care that amensty and not enforcing the immigration laws discriminates against non-Hispanics, they just want the money.
All you goofed up people can't see who is pulling your strings, you are just patsies for Wall Street and the 15 WHITE billionaires who run Mexico.
"you're to the right of W with what you speak. even he knows this country runs on cheap illegal labor and wouldn't betray his corporate masters by completely cutting off the supply of below minimum wage workers. they'd have his head."
This is correct about W's corporate masters. But guess who funds your "ally", the National Immigration Forum? Wall Street and Corporate Foundations.
The Immigration Lawyers support this for their pocketbook, they would make millions off another illegal alien amensty. They don't care that amensty and not enforcing the immigration laws discriminates against non-Hispanics, they just want the money.
All you goofed up people can't see who is pulling your strings, you are just patsies for Wall Street and the 15 WHITE billionaires who run Mexico.
For more information:
http://www.fairimmigration.com
[quote]I don't want my tax dollars to pay for people coming into the country illegally who can barely speak english, can't function in regular society, and work under the table, so americans who actually pay taxes on their earnings go unemployed.
Can I keep my tax dollars and let you pay double for you and me, then?
I am not "against human beings." This is a country. Our tax dollars fuel the country. I don't want to pay for people who sneak into the country illegally and can't even function so they just wind up on welfare and using "free" clinics and other stuff that we normal tax-payers have to pay for. [/quote]
I agree,
and ALSO...the reason wages are low, it's BASIC Economics 101. If you have 10 Mexicans in line to work in the feilds, you better keep them, and you will raise wages to keep them. However, with the HUGE flood of Mexicans, you now have 1000 in line. If you don't pick ther fields for 50cents a bushel, there are 100s( 1000s) in line who will.
So, less immigration will result in wages going up.
Capitalists like illegal immigrants not because they are immigrants but because they are illegal.
A worker with few rights that s/he can safely avail themselves of is an employers wet-dream.
Wages are driven down when a large section of the work-force is scared that the bosses will call INS in response to any signs that collective organization and activity is afoot.
That's why people who sincerely care about the interests of workers believe in open borders.
A worker with few rights that s/he can safely avail themselves of is an employers wet-dream.
Wages are driven down when a large section of the work-force is scared that the bosses will call INS in response to any signs that collective organization and activity is afoot.
That's why people who sincerely care about the interests of workers believe in open borders.
-- most illegals pay taxes just like everyone else
-- illegals tend to use less gov't services than citizens out of fear of deportation and never collect on social security taxes they've paid
-- without illegal labor, you yourself would be paying *much* more at the cash register for many items you buy every day
******* now that you have run on at the mouth, it's time to back it up with your facts. I want to see "real sorces" for this info. or- a retraction of your rant
-- illegals tend to use less gov't services than citizens out of fear of deportation and never collect on social security taxes they've paid
-- without illegal labor, you yourself would be paying *much* more at the cash register for many items you buy every day
******* now that you have run on at the mouth, it's time to back it up with your facts. I want to see "real sorces" for this info. or- a retraction of your rant
That's why people who sincerely care about the interests of workers believe in open borders.
aaron also doesnot have a job, or a life so aaron has nothing to loose except a welfare check.
aaron also doesnot have a job, or a life so aaron has nothing to loose except a welfare check.
Aaron wrote:
"Wages are driven down when a large section of the work-force is scared that the bosses will call INS in response to any signs that collective organization and activity is afoot."
Guess what dude, half of the membership of the UFW and SEIU unions are ILLEGAL ALIENS! If you weren't stuck in a purple haze, you would know this, and you would realize Wall Street is pulling your strings.
This is why you make exactly the same statement as the Wall Street Journal: "keep the borders open" (for cheap labor). This is why you oppose the Real ID Act, just like the Wall Street Journal does. They are pulling your strings!
"Wages are driven down when a large section of the work-force is scared that the bosses will call INS in response to any signs that collective organization and activity is afoot."
Guess what dude, half of the membership of the UFW and SEIU unions are ILLEGAL ALIENS! If you weren't stuck in a purple haze, you would know this, and you would realize Wall Street is pulling your strings.
This is why you make exactly the same statement as the Wall Street Journal: "keep the borders open" (for cheap labor). This is why you oppose the Real ID Act, just like the Wall Street Journal does. They are pulling your strings!
For more information:
http://www.fairimmigration.com
Thew only illegal aliens in the US are the ones who stole the land from the Natives by violating treaties. Many people right-wingers accuse of being illegal can trace more ancestry back to the legitimate owners than can Anglos.
Ignoring the unrealistic, fantasyland retard above who still wants to wax poetic about native americans from 500 years ago, America is full. We don't need more people who aren't educated and can't speak english and aren't "american" in any way and don't plan to be. Look at european countries. They let in violent immigrants from arab countries and now they're fucked. France used to be safe, but now they let in tons of arabs/muslims and now if you go to paris, you CAN'T go to the outer surburbs, unless you want to get robbed (ask anyone from Paris about this). The same goes for holland, and germany. It doesn't work. Western countries have to let in people who want to fit in with the country, not people who either can't communicate, commit crime, have no education and are basically just sapping the country's tax dollars
My mom was an immigrant to america, and she learned english, did well in school, and contributed. She didn't sit on a stoop, pick her nose, and mug people
My mom was an immigrant to america, and she learned english, did well in school, and contributed. She didn't sit on a stoop, pick her nose, and mug people
"The only illegal aliens in the US are the ones who stole the land from the Natives by violating treaties."
Stop using Native American Indians as an excuse to destroy American. 3% of the Minuteman volunteers are American Indians, a higher number than their percentage of the US population. Not only do most "Anglo" Americans want illegal aliens deported, so do a majority of black, Asian, and Native Americans. Plus a majority of Hispanic US citizens.
Why don't you focus instead on the white minority in Mexico that keeps the Mestizo and Native Mexican majority poor and oppressed. Right now all you are doing is helping this white minority by reducing the social pressure on them to enact sorely needed positive reforms.
Stop using Native American Indians as an excuse to destroy American. 3% of the Minuteman volunteers are American Indians, a higher number than their percentage of the US population. Not only do most "Anglo" Americans want illegal aliens deported, so do a majority of black, Asian, and Native Americans. Plus a majority of Hispanic US citizens.
Why don't you focus instead on the white minority in Mexico that keeps the Mestizo and Native Mexican majority poor and oppressed. Right now all you are doing is helping this white minority by reducing the social pressure on them to enact sorely needed positive reforms.
It's funny how so many anti-immigrant zealots attempt to appropriate leftist-sounding arguments when posting in support of their crusade on this forum.
Tim claims I'm doing a wall street's bidding because i don't support enacting more repressive measures against immigrants. He asserts that half of the UFW and SEIU membership are illegals but he: 1) conveniently "forgot" to supply any evidence to support this claim or bother to mention that the vast majority of illegal immigrants work in non-unionized jobs for low-wages; and 2) fails to address the fact that repressive measures, like the ones he supports, are tools used selectively by employers to keep undocumented workers from fighting for better conditions.
What makes Tim's pretense of opposition to Wall Street especially laughable is that his group--"Vietnamese For Fair Immigration"--is clearly composed of ex-South Vietnamese supporters who wish the US had continued bombing their country for another decade or so. Hey Tim: is that another expression of your opposition to Wall Street? HA!
While Tim fronts as a principled opponent of big capital, John pretends to care about the fact that a small number of white billionaires controls Mexico. If he really cared, he'd be opposed to the US government's long-time SUPPORT for this very same white elite, and among other things, call for an end to US military aid and assistance to it--like radicals and leftists have been doing for years.
Joe at least has the decency not wrap his anti-immigrant zealotry in a progressive little box. He's just straight-up racist.
Tim claims I'm doing a wall street's bidding because i don't support enacting more repressive measures against immigrants. He asserts that half of the UFW and SEIU membership are illegals but he: 1) conveniently "forgot" to supply any evidence to support this claim or bother to mention that the vast majority of illegal immigrants work in non-unionized jobs for low-wages; and 2) fails to address the fact that repressive measures, like the ones he supports, are tools used selectively by employers to keep undocumented workers from fighting for better conditions.
What makes Tim's pretense of opposition to Wall Street especially laughable is that his group--"Vietnamese For Fair Immigration"--is clearly composed of ex-South Vietnamese supporters who wish the US had continued bombing their country for another decade or so. Hey Tim: is that another expression of your opposition to Wall Street? HA!
While Tim fronts as a principled opponent of big capital, John pretends to care about the fact that a small number of white billionaires controls Mexico. If he really cared, he'd be opposed to the US government's long-time SUPPORT for this very same white elite, and among other things, call for an end to US military aid and assistance to it--like radicals and leftists have been doing for years.
Joe at least has the decency not wrap his anti-immigrant zealotry in a progressive little box. He's just straight-up racist.
-- "most illegals pay taxes just like everyone else"
wrong. the majority of illegal aliens DO NOT pay taxes, not even property tax (excluding sales tax, being that EVERYONE pays that, including tourists).
-- "illegals tend to use less gov't services than citizens out of fear of deportation and never collect on social security taxes they've paid"
true, only approximately 1/3 of illegals do, but only because of their current numbers. i'm not sure you could say the same in 20 years if the problem flourished like it's past levels.
another point is that if we gave them driver's licenses and other benefits, i think eventually they would feel comfortable enough going to the welfare office.
-- "without illegal labor, you yourself would be paying *much* more at the cash register for many items you buy every day"
by mere cents, it's been analyzed. companies would simply have to hire only LEGAL residents for a liveable wage. aww, boo hoo. and even if i did have to pay a substantial amount of money for a head of lettuce, i'd gladly do so.
"you're to the right of W with what you speak. even he knows this country runs on cheap illegal labor and wouldn't betray his corporate masters by completely cutting off the supply of below minimum wage workers."
he's a neo-con and a globalist. he's in bed with companies that gain from subsidized labor. and the public is slowing acting upon some real long overdue solutions for this mess.
and i'm never supporting that stupid psuedo-punk/anarchist organization known as "food not bombs".
wrong. the majority of illegal aliens DO NOT pay taxes, not even property tax (excluding sales tax, being that EVERYONE pays that, including tourists).
-- "illegals tend to use less gov't services than citizens out of fear of deportation and never collect on social security taxes they've paid"
true, only approximately 1/3 of illegals do, but only because of their current numbers. i'm not sure you could say the same in 20 years if the problem flourished like it's past levels.
another point is that if we gave them driver's licenses and other benefits, i think eventually they would feel comfortable enough going to the welfare office.
-- "without illegal labor, you yourself would be paying *much* more at the cash register for many items you buy every day"
by mere cents, it's been analyzed. companies would simply have to hire only LEGAL residents for a liveable wage. aww, boo hoo. and even if i did have to pay a substantial amount of money for a head of lettuce, i'd gladly do so.
"you're to the right of W with what you speak. even he knows this country runs on cheap illegal labor and wouldn't betray his corporate masters by completely cutting off the supply of below minimum wage workers."
he's a neo-con and a globalist. he's in bed with companies that gain from subsidized labor. and the public is slowing acting upon some real long overdue solutions for this mess.
and i'm never supporting that stupid psuedo-punk/anarchist organization known as "food not bombs".
as fas as "aaron" is concerned: you can make all the accusations your little "progressive" mind can think up. the problem is, we're a country, we have laws, and we have borders. sorry, but the majority of people agree with that.
i'm not a racist, or a south vietnamese anti-communist, or anti-immigrant. i don't use "leftist" arguments, i use logic and facts.
i AM opposed to the US government's long-time SUPPORT of the big elite in Mexico, but 1) i would never associate with your neo-anarchist ilk, (which carry some strange and hilarious ideals behind your actions) who would fight that issue, and 2) i don't know of any large "military aid or assistance" from the US being sent to Mexico to support these big elite, directly. i'd like to see some proof of that.
i'm not a racist, or a south vietnamese anti-communist, or anti-immigrant. i don't use "leftist" arguments, i use logic and facts.
i AM opposed to the US government's long-time SUPPORT of the big elite in Mexico, but 1) i would never associate with your neo-anarchist ilk, (which carry some strange and hilarious ideals behind your actions) who would fight that issue, and 2) i don't know of any large "military aid or assistance" from the US being sent to Mexico to support these big elite, directly. i'd like to see some proof of that.
For more information:
http://www.cis.org
2) fails to address the fact that repressive measures, like the ones he supports, are tools used selectively by employers to keep undocumented workers from fighting for better conditions.
1. the burden of proof is on the employers.
2. wouldn't it make more sense to go after the employers that violate worker's rights as opposed to so-called "repressive" laws?
that follows the same logic of: let's get rid of laws because too many times, cops violate people's civil rights (instead of simply going after specific cops who are the culprits).
1. the burden of proof is on the employers.
2. wouldn't it make more sense to go after the employers that violate worker's rights as opposed to so-called "repressive" laws?
that follows the same logic of: let's get rid of laws because too many times, cops violate people's civil rights (instead of simply going after specific cops who are the culprits).
For more information:
http://www.cis.org
Aaron, you did not refute that you are doing Wall Street's bidding.
If you want to find out about the UFW and SEIU membership, call them up and ask. I did. Plus why do they spend millions trying to get amnesty for illegal aliens?
"repressive measures, like the ones he supports, are tools used selectively by employers to keep undocumented workers from fighting for better conditions." We support strictly enforcing the laws against hiring illegal aliens. If employers cannot hire illegal aliens, how can they be repressed?
How do you know what South Vietnamese wanted, you weren't there. We wanted the US to keep supplying us with equipment and weapons as they promised in the 1972 agreement. This would have cost much less than what the Americans wasted when they were there. But the US reneged and cut off all support.
Yes, we support capitalism, but not corruption and all power being held by a rich few. This is Wall Street's method and purpose in supporting illegal immigration.
But the best part is you say 1 million Vietnamese immigrants are "anti-immigrant". Like I said, stuck in a purple haze.
If you want to find out about the UFW and SEIU membership, call them up and ask. I did. Plus why do they spend millions trying to get amnesty for illegal aliens?
"repressive measures, like the ones he supports, are tools used selectively by employers to keep undocumented workers from fighting for better conditions." We support strictly enforcing the laws against hiring illegal aliens. If employers cannot hire illegal aliens, how can they be repressed?
How do you know what South Vietnamese wanted, you weren't there. We wanted the US to keep supplying us with equipment and weapons as they promised in the 1972 agreement. This would have cost much less than what the Americans wasted when they were there. But the US reneged and cut off all support.
Yes, we support capitalism, but not corruption and all power being held by a rich few. This is Wall Street's method and purpose in supporting illegal immigration.
But the best part is you say 1 million Vietnamese immigrants are "anti-immigrant". Like I said, stuck in a purple haze.
When I say Wall Street, I mean the super rich 1,000 or so Americans who have 25% of the wealth. Not the average American stock investor or broker.
Maybe there is a better name for them.
Maybe there is a better name for them.
No drivers license, no bank account, no passport, can't enter a federal court(no access to the courts). UNRealID
Beware it is coming in 2005, the RFID passport starts over the next couple mos.
I know many americain citizens who are not allowed to legally drive. There called divorced fathers, no right to an identity, no right to work. Thats what happens to a CITIZEN.
You cannot legally open a bank account overseas either, a passport is required and a US passport makes the bank liable to the patriot act for all customers.
You cany get around this, there is no more provacy, no more right to free media as they know every person and can have you arrested without charges as they do now with unwanted reporters in IRAQ.
Mexico won't accept americain immigrants they have FREEDOM there and they want it protected.
In a few months the border with mexico is set to close for americains leaving, you will have to answer to "papers please" and have a passport that requires a REAL ID to leave the USA!
Beware it is coming in 2005, the RFID passport starts over the next couple mos.
I know many americain citizens who are not allowed to legally drive. There called divorced fathers, no right to an identity, no right to work. Thats what happens to a CITIZEN.
You cannot legally open a bank account overseas either, a passport is required and a US passport makes the bank liable to the patriot act for all customers.
You cany get around this, there is no more provacy, no more right to free media as they know every person and can have you arrested without charges as they do now with unwanted reporters in IRAQ.
Mexico won't accept americain immigrants they have FREEDOM there and they want it protected.
In a few months the border with mexico is set to close for americains leaving, you will have to answer to "papers please" and have a passport that requires a REAL ID to leave the USA!
For more information:
http://www.unrealid.com/
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$470.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network