From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Queer Law Students Want to Kick the Military Off Campus
Queer law student groups from UC Berkeley, Golden Gate University, UC Hastings, New College, Santa Clara and the University of San Francisco, terming themselves the Coalition of Queer Law Student Associations (CQLSA), are protesting the military recruitment at the 21st Annual Northern California Public Interest/Public Sector (PI/PS) Legal Careers Day. The event, an all-day career fair for public interest oriented law students hosted by the Public Interest Clearinghouse and nine Northern California law schools, is scheduled for Saturday, February 12th at UC Hasting College of the Law. The protest challenges the decision of organizers of PI/PS day to allow the military to recruit at the event despite the Third Circuit Court of Appeals recent ruling in Fair v. Rumsfeld.
For more information, please contact:
Chelsea HaleyNelson, USF Pride Law President/CQLSA
lonandchel [at] aol.com
(510) 459-7309
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Queer Law Students Want to Kick the Military Off Campus
Queer law student groups from UC Berkeley, Golden Gate University, UC Hastings, New College, Santa Clara and the University of San Francisco, terming themselves the Coalition of Queer Law Student Associations (CQLSA), are protesting the military recruitment at the 21st Annual Northern California Public Interest/Public Sector (PI/PS) Legal Careers Day. The event, an all-day career fair for public interest oriented law students hosted by the Public Interest Clearinghouse and nine Northern California law schools, is scheduled for Saturday, February 12th at UC Hasting College of the Law. The protest challenges the decision of organizers of PI/PS day to allow the military to recruit at the event despite the Third Circuit Court of Appeals recent ruling in Fair v. Rumsfeld.
Fair v. Rumsfeld challenged the Solomon Amendment, a federal statute that punishes Universities with a loss of federal grants and contracts if they exclude military recruiters from their campuses. Law schools have had in existence anti-discrimination policies which prohibit recruitment of students on campus by employers who discriminate on the basis of race, gender, disability or sexual orientation. Law schools have sought consistently to enforce this policy against the military which discriminates against lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender (LGBT) individuals in military service.
In November 2004, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Solomon Amendment is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment. Specifically, based on the preliminary injunction record before it, the court held that it was unconstitutional for Congress to command that schools affirmatively assist military recruiters, or even to require schools to allow the military on campus to recruit. The Court ruled that the Solomon Amendment violates both a school’s right of expressive association and its right to be free from compelled speech under the First Amendment. The penalty, the loss of all federal money across the board, the Court said, is analyzed for First Amendment purposes as if it were a command. The case was sent back to the District Court with instructions to issue the requested injunction against the Solomon Amendment pending outcome of the case. The government has said that it will appeal the Third Circuit’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The lawsuit challenging the Solomon Amendment was brought by the SALT, an association of 900 law professors, and FAIR, an association of 26 law schools and their faculties, whose state mission is to promote academic freedom and to support educational institutions as opposing discrimination. Incorporated in New Jersey in September 2003, FAIR was conceived by Kent Greenfield, a professor at Boston College of the Law, and originally formed to fill a vacuum created by the AALS’s refusal on institutional grounds to litigate against the Solomon Amendment. 18 law school faculties and 8 law schools as institutions have signed onto and participated in the recent suit against the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Education and others.
The Bay Area queer law student groups comprising CQLSA are protesting the decision of organizers of PI/PS Day to allow military recruiters at an event specifically designed for public interest and social justice minded law students. CQLSA claims that this decision makes the organizers complicit with the policies of the military which unjustly degrade members of the queer community and sacrifices the integrity of the law schools participating in PI/PS Day. Two law schools taking part in the protest, Golden Gate University and University of San Francisco, were also part of the Fair v. Rumsfeld suit.
The protest will be held between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. at UC Hastings College of the Law on February 12, 205. Members of all local queer law student groups will participate. CQLSA is also forming a joint action plan to eliminate military recruitment at PI/PS Day and are garnering statements of support for their efforts from local bar associations, LGBT organizations and public interest law firms.
Chelsea HaleyNelson, USF Pride Law President/CQLSA
lonandchel [at] aol.com
(510) 459-7309
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Queer Law Students Want to Kick the Military Off Campus
Queer law student groups from UC Berkeley, Golden Gate University, UC Hastings, New College, Santa Clara and the University of San Francisco, terming themselves the Coalition of Queer Law Student Associations (CQLSA), are protesting the military recruitment at the 21st Annual Northern California Public Interest/Public Sector (PI/PS) Legal Careers Day. The event, an all-day career fair for public interest oriented law students hosted by the Public Interest Clearinghouse and nine Northern California law schools, is scheduled for Saturday, February 12th at UC Hasting College of the Law. The protest challenges the decision of organizers of PI/PS day to allow the military to recruit at the event despite the Third Circuit Court of Appeals recent ruling in Fair v. Rumsfeld.
Fair v. Rumsfeld challenged the Solomon Amendment, a federal statute that punishes Universities with a loss of federal grants and contracts if they exclude military recruiters from their campuses. Law schools have had in existence anti-discrimination policies which prohibit recruitment of students on campus by employers who discriminate on the basis of race, gender, disability or sexual orientation. Law schools have sought consistently to enforce this policy against the military which discriminates against lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender (LGBT) individuals in military service.
In November 2004, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Solomon Amendment is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment. Specifically, based on the preliminary injunction record before it, the court held that it was unconstitutional for Congress to command that schools affirmatively assist military recruiters, or even to require schools to allow the military on campus to recruit. The Court ruled that the Solomon Amendment violates both a school’s right of expressive association and its right to be free from compelled speech under the First Amendment. The penalty, the loss of all federal money across the board, the Court said, is analyzed for First Amendment purposes as if it were a command. The case was sent back to the District Court with instructions to issue the requested injunction against the Solomon Amendment pending outcome of the case. The government has said that it will appeal the Third Circuit’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The lawsuit challenging the Solomon Amendment was brought by the SALT, an association of 900 law professors, and FAIR, an association of 26 law schools and their faculties, whose state mission is to promote academic freedom and to support educational institutions as opposing discrimination. Incorporated in New Jersey in September 2003, FAIR was conceived by Kent Greenfield, a professor at Boston College of the Law, and originally formed to fill a vacuum created by the AALS’s refusal on institutional grounds to litigate against the Solomon Amendment. 18 law school faculties and 8 law schools as institutions have signed onto and participated in the recent suit against the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Education and others.
The Bay Area queer law student groups comprising CQLSA are protesting the decision of organizers of PI/PS Day to allow military recruiters at an event specifically designed for public interest and social justice minded law students. CQLSA claims that this decision makes the organizers complicit with the policies of the military which unjustly degrade members of the queer community and sacrifices the integrity of the law schools participating in PI/PS Day. Two law schools taking part in the protest, Golden Gate University and University of San Francisco, were also part of the Fair v. Rumsfeld suit.
The protest will be held between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. at UC Hastings College of the Law on February 12, 205. Members of all local queer law student groups will participate. CQLSA is also forming a joint action plan to eliminate military recruitment at PI/PS Day and are garnering statements of support for their efforts from local bar associations, LGBT organizations and public interest law firms.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
UC Hasings College of Law is at Mcallister and Larkin in San Francisco, close to tthe Civic Center BART station.
I'm supportive of all human rights except the right to take my tax money, kill innocent families and other gay people all over the world, and then complain because you aren't allowed to help. You want the right want to be gay and kill for cash and Christ and country. Grow up. This is the apex of crypto fascist blindness and bespeaks your lack of political acumen.
The student organizers recognize that the military oppresses more than just LGBT people - people of color and the poor all suffer from the U.S.'s military policies.
However, the focus of this protest is on the unconstitutionality of the military's open and blatant discrimination against queers, and the right, nay duty, of schools to exclude employers who openly discriminate.
This protest is in no way an endorsement of the military's other hiring and promotion practices, nor is it an endorsement of the U.S.'s foreign policy. The organizers and protestors have and will continue to stand with social justice movements of all stripes. In the statement of support that all concerned groups and individuals are invited to sign on to or endorse, the organizers acknowledge and condemn the many unjust aspects of the U.S. military.
Without speaking for all the protestors and organizers, I believe this protest is a strategic decision to keep a narrow focus to get the military out of our schools in as effective a way as possible.
However, the focus of this protest is on the unconstitutionality of the military's open and blatant discrimination against queers, and the right, nay duty, of schools to exclude employers who openly discriminate.
This protest is in no way an endorsement of the military's other hiring and promotion practices, nor is it an endorsement of the U.S.'s foreign policy. The organizers and protestors have and will continue to stand with social justice movements of all stripes. In the statement of support that all concerned groups and individuals are invited to sign on to or endorse, the organizers acknowledge and condemn the many unjust aspects of the U.S. military.
Without speaking for all the protestors and organizers, I believe this protest is a strategic decision to keep a narrow focus to get the military out of our schools in as effective a way as possible.
you have no basis, but is doing so you may get your selves expelled. Hay a few less laywers the world will be a better place
yeah that's so anarchal wolfey. seriously all of us trying to get military recruiters off campus are assimilationist queers? whatevs. the military is a nationalist homophobic sexist racist institution that takes advantage of its own as well as the ones it's trying to "colonize," generating desensitized macho conformity to justify all sorts of heinous atrocities. if the conflict between the solomon amendment and school nondiscrimination policies are the systemic hook kids use to confront broader issues of miltary recruitment so be it, as long as we're all given the opportunity to look at the bigger picture. i'm really tired of catty criticism presented as revolutionary lipservice to make people feel guilty about the work that they are doing. it's not necessary to reconcile systemic and non-systemic organizing but i think it's possible to understand that people need something to grab onto (in terms of infecting dominant public policy laws or social understanding) and that dropping some of that fucked up self-defeatism among queer activists and political activists in general might do all of us a little good since we're not getting all that much support elsewhere...
Whatever way you cut it, challenging the the US military on grounds that it does not allow gays and lesbians to openly join is POLITICALLY weak. It suggests that the US military would be worth supporting if it had a more open policy. It does NOTHING to strengthen a movement to expose and fight the underlying interests that make the US military machine "go."
i think challenging the military on a variety of grounds while challenging our schools for failing to uphold their nondiscrimination policies is a decent idea. no it's not ideal but what is? dialogues like this are too often cyclical stunted and counterproductive. i don't think current efforts against military recruitment on campus means that queers are vying for the opportunity to march to the mouth of the cannon. rather this is a welcome opportunity to highlight ongoing opposition to war and the "war machine." i do worry that this message could get lost in favor of the more affirmative action-oriented, let's all be gay in army fatigues position, but i think it's possible to use this as an opportunity to at the environment that the military fosters and how this environment plays into larger issues of imperialism and state-sanctioned terrorism. we can also encourage our schools to take a stand against the government by refusing to allow recruiters on campus which would be a pretty fucking encouraging thing if you ask me...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network