Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
UFCW wants to sell bad contract
News is in of a tentative agreement between the UFCW and the grocers.
I just saw UFCW honchos on the news calling this a great win because they've gotten the grocers to back-off on the two-tier pay structure. Even assuming this part is real, closer inspection reveals the UFCW's triumphant victory is anything but.
According to the SF Chron story (which I've pasted below), if ratified, under this great contract between the UFCW and Safeway, Albertsons and Kroger:
--Health co-payments for workers hired after ratification will increase by some unspecified amount
--The amount retired workers pay to maintain their health plans will increase from $0 to $70/month
--The number of hours new employees will have to work to rise to the top of the pay scale will go up to 7,800. This is four times the hours previously required.
--It will take new hires six years to reach the top level of health care benefits and wages, up dramatically from before (back-door two-tier?)
--The grocers will also get the option to buy-out veteran workers to reduce labor cost
"Grocers, unions reach contract terms
Tentative deal averts labor strife that roiled south state"
George Raine and Todd Wallack, Chronicle Staff Writers
Tuesday, January 25, 2005
A tentative contract settlement has been reached between the unions representing 20,000 Bay Area grocery workers and the three major chains that employ them, the first step in averting a replay of the Southern California labor dispute that left thousands out of work for months last year and cost the companies millions.
California's grocery industry -- anchored by Safeway, Albertsons and Kroger -- has engaged in intense labor negotiations over the past year. The store owners argued that "big box" competitors" like Wal-Mart and Costco posed a major threat, while union leaders resisted reduced benefits and two-tiered wage structures.
The Bay Area agreement, struck late Sunday and up for a ratification vote by union members in coming weeks, does not include a permanent, two-tier system of wages and benefits -- a kind of class system that the union ultimately agreed to in Southern California, according to a labor spokesman. However, there is a longer progression for new hires to reach the top tier for both wages and benefits.
"This is a very good contract in a very tough context -- the precedent in Southern California and in the shadow of Wal-Mart,'' said Harley Shaiken, a labor specialist at UC Berkeley. "I think what the union was able to do is preserve some important precedents while making some painful sacrifices. And in the long term, the precedents may prove more important.''
Safeway and Albertsons officials did not return telephone calls, but the companies issued statements saying they were pleased to announce the tentative agreement. They offered no details about its contents. The workers will be voting via mail, and the results will be know in two to three weeks.
Negotiators for the eight locals of the United Food and Commercial Workers in the Bay Area unanimously said they would enthusiastically recommend ratification of the tentative deal. The pact will affect another 10,000 UFCW members employed by other stores in the Bay Area.
Currently, a journeyman clerk earns $19.08 an hour, said Richard Benson, president of UFCW Local 870 in Hayward. The proposal is to require new employees to work 7,800 hours, beginning at about $8 an hour, to reach the top tier. Attaining top scale would require working full-time for 3 1/2 years under the new deal, compared with one year under the current contract. It would take new hires six years to reach the top level of health care benefits, the union said.
New employees hired after ratification also would have higher co-payments for visits to doctors' offices and prescription drugs, but the proposal would not add an employee health care premium co-pay.
"What makes this a good deal?" Ron Lind, a spokesman for the coalition of UFCW locals, asked rhetorically. "They avoid a two-tier system, maintain good benefits, they do not have premium-sharing, and they do not have to walk a picket line for 4 1/2 months to get it. I'm confident that the vast majority of our members will ratify this.''
Lind, at a news conference at UFCW offices in San Jose Monday, said accepting three levels of health care for new hires -- although they get top-tier benefits if they stay long enough -- was a difficult compromise for the union. Moreover, retirees beginning next month will have to pay $70 per month for health care for themselves and a spouse, if the deal is ratified. Hitherto, they paid nothing.
A bonus is proposed for workers -- 25 cents for each hour worked last year -- and a pay raise of 25 cents per hour for those receiving top scale, effective Dec. 3, 2006. The current contract has four steps in pay grade; the proposed deal has nine.
"We could have gone for a bigger wage increase, but it would have had to come out of our health care benefits plan, and that was our priority," said Lind.
"Some difficult decisions had to be made in order to avoid a dispute, but with marathon bargaining sessions over the past week we were able to preserve important components of our contract," Lind said. That included maintaining both union and employer trustees looking over the health care plan and prevailing, the union said, where the employers wanted to weaken job security.
Lind said that the general outline of the settlement followed that of the contract recently approved by grocery workers in the Sacramento Valley, an agreement upon which the Bay Area locals built.
The Sacramento Valley workers accepted annual health care deductibles -- up to $600 for veteran workers and $1,800 for new hires.
As in the Sacramento Valley, the employers in the Bay Area would have the option of offering buyouts to veteran workers and thereby reducing their labor costs. However, Lind said while that Safeway had shown an interest in offering buyouts,
Albertsons had not. The two chains combined have 182 stores in the Bay Area.
Lind called the agreement in Northern California the best in the grocery industry in the nation, and Mitchell Corwin, a financial analyst with Morningstar in Chicago, noted it was far better than last year's Southern California deal.
"I don't think either side wants to go through what they went through in Southern California,'' said Corwin. "Both sides lost in Southern California. Both sides really wanted at the end of the day to get something done.''
Scot Beckenbaugh, acting director of the U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, commended both sides for striking a deal. "This tentative agreement is important to the Bay Area economy and is crucial to the livelihoods of thousands of employees and their families and to the companies for whom they work,'' he said.
Shaiken, at UC Berkeley, noted the union victory in escaping responsibility for their health care premiums, which can and have increased dramatically.
"Health care is not simply the 800-pound gorilla of labor negotiations, it is a wildly unpredictable gorilla," he said. "Higher co-pays are a fixed cost. But if they pay the premiums, they can rise in a way that is high and unexpected.''
Benson, the Local 870 president, said that negotiations had close to collapsing at the eleventh hour in a struggle over job security. He said the employers wanted the option of having courtesy clerks do the work of apprentice food clerks, a higher classification. "While it seems like a small issue, it can be a huge issue,'' said Benson. "They would have saved an enormous amount of money, but they backed off,'' he said of the employers.
Lind said that the 85,000 signatures gathered from largely Safeway customers in the Bay Area, saying they would support the workers in the event of a strike or boycott, had influenced the talks.
The tentative contract agreement between Bay Area union food clerks and Safeway, Albertsons and Kroger includes:
-- There will be no permanent two-tier workforce in wages and benefits.
-- Co-payments for office visits and prescription drugs for workers hired after ratification will be increased.
-- Retired workers will begin paying $70 per month to maintain health plans.
-- New employees will have to work 7,800 hours to rise to the top of the pay scale, nearly four times as long as current workers were required.
E-mail the writers at graine [at] sfchronicle.com and twallack [at] sfchroicle.com
.
According to the SF Chron story (which I've pasted below), if ratified, under this great contract between the UFCW and Safeway, Albertsons and Kroger:
--Health co-payments for workers hired after ratification will increase by some unspecified amount
--The amount retired workers pay to maintain their health plans will increase from $0 to $70/month
--The number of hours new employees will have to work to rise to the top of the pay scale will go up to 7,800. This is four times the hours previously required.
--It will take new hires six years to reach the top level of health care benefits and wages, up dramatically from before (back-door two-tier?)
--The grocers will also get the option to buy-out veteran workers to reduce labor cost
"Grocers, unions reach contract terms
Tentative deal averts labor strife that roiled south state"
George Raine and Todd Wallack, Chronicle Staff Writers
Tuesday, January 25, 2005
A tentative contract settlement has been reached between the unions representing 20,000 Bay Area grocery workers and the three major chains that employ them, the first step in averting a replay of the Southern California labor dispute that left thousands out of work for months last year and cost the companies millions.
California's grocery industry -- anchored by Safeway, Albertsons and Kroger -- has engaged in intense labor negotiations over the past year. The store owners argued that "big box" competitors" like Wal-Mart and Costco posed a major threat, while union leaders resisted reduced benefits and two-tiered wage structures.
The Bay Area agreement, struck late Sunday and up for a ratification vote by union members in coming weeks, does not include a permanent, two-tier system of wages and benefits -- a kind of class system that the union ultimately agreed to in Southern California, according to a labor spokesman. However, there is a longer progression for new hires to reach the top tier for both wages and benefits.
"This is a very good contract in a very tough context -- the precedent in Southern California and in the shadow of Wal-Mart,'' said Harley Shaiken, a labor specialist at UC Berkeley. "I think what the union was able to do is preserve some important precedents while making some painful sacrifices. And in the long term, the precedents may prove more important.''
Safeway and Albertsons officials did not return telephone calls, but the companies issued statements saying they were pleased to announce the tentative agreement. They offered no details about its contents. The workers will be voting via mail, and the results will be know in two to three weeks.
Negotiators for the eight locals of the United Food and Commercial Workers in the Bay Area unanimously said they would enthusiastically recommend ratification of the tentative deal. The pact will affect another 10,000 UFCW members employed by other stores in the Bay Area.
Currently, a journeyman clerk earns $19.08 an hour, said Richard Benson, president of UFCW Local 870 in Hayward. The proposal is to require new employees to work 7,800 hours, beginning at about $8 an hour, to reach the top tier. Attaining top scale would require working full-time for 3 1/2 years under the new deal, compared with one year under the current contract. It would take new hires six years to reach the top level of health care benefits, the union said.
New employees hired after ratification also would have higher co-payments for visits to doctors' offices and prescription drugs, but the proposal would not add an employee health care premium co-pay.
"What makes this a good deal?" Ron Lind, a spokesman for the coalition of UFCW locals, asked rhetorically. "They avoid a two-tier system, maintain good benefits, they do not have premium-sharing, and they do not have to walk a picket line for 4 1/2 months to get it. I'm confident that the vast majority of our members will ratify this.''
Lind, at a news conference at UFCW offices in San Jose Monday, said accepting three levels of health care for new hires -- although they get top-tier benefits if they stay long enough -- was a difficult compromise for the union. Moreover, retirees beginning next month will have to pay $70 per month for health care for themselves and a spouse, if the deal is ratified. Hitherto, they paid nothing.
A bonus is proposed for workers -- 25 cents for each hour worked last year -- and a pay raise of 25 cents per hour for those receiving top scale, effective Dec. 3, 2006. The current contract has four steps in pay grade; the proposed deal has nine.
"We could have gone for a bigger wage increase, but it would have had to come out of our health care benefits plan, and that was our priority," said Lind.
"Some difficult decisions had to be made in order to avoid a dispute, but with marathon bargaining sessions over the past week we were able to preserve important components of our contract," Lind said. That included maintaining both union and employer trustees looking over the health care plan and prevailing, the union said, where the employers wanted to weaken job security.
Lind said that the general outline of the settlement followed that of the contract recently approved by grocery workers in the Sacramento Valley, an agreement upon which the Bay Area locals built.
The Sacramento Valley workers accepted annual health care deductibles -- up to $600 for veteran workers and $1,800 for new hires.
As in the Sacramento Valley, the employers in the Bay Area would have the option of offering buyouts to veteran workers and thereby reducing their labor costs. However, Lind said while that Safeway had shown an interest in offering buyouts,
Albertsons had not. The two chains combined have 182 stores in the Bay Area.
Lind called the agreement in Northern California the best in the grocery industry in the nation, and Mitchell Corwin, a financial analyst with Morningstar in Chicago, noted it was far better than last year's Southern California deal.
"I don't think either side wants to go through what they went through in Southern California,'' said Corwin. "Both sides lost in Southern California. Both sides really wanted at the end of the day to get something done.''
Scot Beckenbaugh, acting director of the U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, commended both sides for striking a deal. "This tentative agreement is important to the Bay Area economy and is crucial to the livelihoods of thousands of employees and their families and to the companies for whom they work,'' he said.
Shaiken, at UC Berkeley, noted the union victory in escaping responsibility for their health care premiums, which can and have increased dramatically.
"Health care is not simply the 800-pound gorilla of labor negotiations, it is a wildly unpredictable gorilla," he said. "Higher co-pays are a fixed cost. But if they pay the premiums, they can rise in a way that is high and unexpected.''
Benson, the Local 870 president, said that negotiations had close to collapsing at the eleventh hour in a struggle over job security. He said the employers wanted the option of having courtesy clerks do the work of apprentice food clerks, a higher classification. "While it seems like a small issue, it can be a huge issue,'' said Benson. "They would have saved an enormous amount of money, but they backed off,'' he said of the employers.
Lind said that the 85,000 signatures gathered from largely Safeway customers in the Bay Area, saying they would support the workers in the event of a strike or boycott, had influenced the talks.
The tentative contract agreement between Bay Area union food clerks and Safeway, Albertsons and Kroger includes:
-- There will be no permanent two-tier workforce in wages and benefits.
-- Co-payments for office visits and prescription drugs for workers hired after ratification will be increased.
-- Retired workers will begin paying $70 per month to maintain health plans.
-- New employees will have to work 7,800 hours to rise to the top of the pay scale, nearly four times as long as current workers were required.
E-mail the writers at graine [at] sfchronicle.com and twallack [at] sfchroicle.com
.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
A lot of folks will probably blame it on Loveall and the Sacramento and Central Valley locals setting precedent with their weak contracts, and they are partly to blame. But it doesn't seem like the Bay Area Coalition as directed by the different locals did nearly enough to deal with what they knew was coming down the pipeline, the previous locals settling for bad deals, and Safeway et al not wanting to budge on their attempts to destroy the union. More later...
Thanks for the breakdown above Aaron it helps to begun to understand what the contract looks like.
Thanks for the breakdown above Aaron it helps to begun to understand what the contract looks like.
great synopsis...
I think instead of blaming lovall we should blame the UFCW itself. While other unions are winning gains by using tougher tactics the UFCW can only come up with a boycott campaign in northern CA - where it had huge community support during the so cal grocery strike?
it's sad.
I think instead of blaming lovall we should blame the UFCW itself. While other unions are winning gains by using tougher tactics the UFCW can only come up with a boycott campaign in northern CA - where it had huge community support during the so cal grocery strike?
it's sad.
This guy Michael Totten is a popular liberal Hawk blogger. Check him out http://www.michaeltotten.com.
Good summary on the UCFW-- Probably the worst of the big unions.
Good summary on the UCFW-- Probably the worst of the big unions.
There is also some good info at http://www.reapinc.org and http://www.ufcw.net.
I agree its not completely Loveall's fault - It's just as much the crooked international for not stopping crooked locals like 588 and 1288(the Central Valley local). They have no problem stepping in and trusteeing a good local, ot even threatening a local that does the right thing, but when it comes to actually doing something aggressive for the membership it just doesn't seem to happen one way or another.
If the locals would have been able to stick together one way or another things might have been different. The unions could have involved their members more, but there doesn't seem to be much democracy or forethought in the international. They only have their international convention every 5 years and even then it is mostly staff and the biggest crooked locals making the decisions. They didn't even plan how to deal with the grocery struggle at the last convention in SF, and weren't even able to figure out how to help out the Tyson workers who were on strike at the time of the convention and eventually ended up losing their fight and even their jobs(as they were replaced with scabs).
Anyway, things are going to have change one way or another before the next contract otherwise the UFCW will be gone.
I agree its not completely Loveall's fault - It's just as much the crooked international for not stopping crooked locals like 588 and 1288(the Central Valley local). They have no problem stepping in and trusteeing a good local, ot even threatening a local that does the right thing, but when it comes to actually doing something aggressive for the membership it just doesn't seem to happen one way or another.
If the locals would have been able to stick together one way or another things might have been different. The unions could have involved their members more, but there doesn't seem to be much democracy or forethought in the international. They only have their international convention every 5 years and even then it is mostly staff and the biggest crooked locals making the decisions. They didn't even plan how to deal with the grocery struggle at the last convention in SF, and weren't even able to figure out how to help out the Tyson workers who were on strike at the time of the convention and eventually ended up losing their fight and even their jobs(as they were replaced with scabs).
Anyway, things are going to have change one way or another before the next contract otherwise the UFCW will be gone.
what's really striking about this agreement is the extent to which future grocery store employees will bear the brunt of the union's give-backs.
the UCFW leaders are clearly hoping it's easier to push through a give-back contract when those most adversely affected by it don't get a vote.
and the union hacks wonder why so many wage-slaves are indifferent when not hostile to their "cause"!!
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
on a different note: does anybody have any additional news about this agreement and the response its getting from grocery workers?
are there any union stalwarts out there who are willing to defend this agreement between the UCFW and the grocery chains?
the UCFW leaders are clearly hoping it's easier to push through a give-back contract when those most adversely affected by it don't get a vote.
and the union hacks wonder why so many wage-slaves are indifferent when not hostile to their "cause"!!
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
on a different note: does anybody have any additional news about this agreement and the response its getting from grocery workers?
are there any union stalwarts out there who are willing to defend this agreement between the UCFW and the grocery chains?
You can find more info on the contract by checking out the Bay Area Coalition's bargaining update section of their website - http://www.bayareacoalition.org
You can probably also find more info by either checking out the different local's websites or calling UFCW bargaining hotlines listed on their websites. Most Northern Cali locals are linked off of the Coalition website.
Otherwise hopefully folks will start going to the stores and talking to the workers there. Personally I haven't had a chance to yet.
You can probably also find more info by either checking out the different local's websites or calling UFCW bargaining hotlines listed on their websites. Most Northern Cali locals are linked off of the Coalition website.
Otherwise hopefully folks will start going to the stores and talking to the workers there. Personally I haven't had a chance to yet.
The end is near.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$375.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network