From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Interview: Noam Chomsky supports a draft army without class bias
MY GOODMAN: Noam Chomsky, speaking on Sunday in Princeton, New Jersey.
Afterwards, he was asked a series of question, one of them was, would the
draft be reinstated.
Afterwards, he was asked a series of question, one of them was, would the
draft be reinstated.
NOAM CHOMSKY: I think it's extremely unlikely. I should tell you this as a
word of personal background. I was very much involved in the resistance
movement in the 1960's. In fact, I was just barely -- the only reason I
missed a long jail sentence is because the Tet Offensive came along and
the trials were called off. So I was very much involved in the resistance,
but I was never against the draft. I disagreed with a lot of my friends
and associates on that, for a very good reason, I think at least as nobody
seems to agree. In my view, if there's going to be an army, I think it
ought to be a citizen's army. Now, here I do agree with some people, the
top brass, they don't want a citizen's army. They want a mercenary army,
what we call a volunteer army. A mercenary army of the disadvantaged. And
in fact, in the Vietnam war, the U.S. military realized, they had made a
very bad mistake. I mean, for the first time I think ever in the history
of European imperialism, including us, they had used a citizen's army to
fight a vicious, brutal, colonial war, and civilians just cannot do that
kind of a thing. For that, you need the French foreign legion, the Gurkhas
or something like that. Every predecessor has used mercenaries, often
drawn from the country that they're attacking like England ran India with
Indian mercenaries. You take them from one place and send them to kill people in the other place. That's the standard way to run imperial wars.
They're just too brutal and violent and murderous. Civilians are not going
to be able to do it for very long. What happened was, the army started
falling apart. One of the reasons that the army was withdrawn was because
the top military wanted it out of there. They were afraid they were not
going to have an army anymore. Soldiers were fragging officer. The whole
thing was falling apart. They were on drugs. And thats why I think that
they're not going to have a draft. That's why I
m in favor of it. If there's going to be an army that will fight brutal,
colonial wars, and that's the only likely kind of war, I
m not talking about the militarization of space and that kind of thing, I
mean ground wars, it ought to be a citizen's army so that the attitudes of
the society are reflected in the military.
word of personal background. I was very much involved in the resistance
movement in the 1960's. In fact, I was just barely -- the only reason I
missed a long jail sentence is because the Tet Offensive came along and
the trials were called off. So I was very much involved in the resistance,
but I was never against the draft. I disagreed with a lot of my friends
and associates on that, for a very good reason, I think at least as nobody
seems to agree. In my view, if there's going to be an army, I think it
ought to be a citizen's army. Now, here I do agree with some people, the
top brass, they don't want a citizen's army. They want a mercenary army,
what we call a volunteer army. A mercenary army of the disadvantaged. And
in fact, in the Vietnam war, the U.S. military realized, they had made a
very bad mistake. I mean, for the first time I think ever in the history
of European imperialism, including us, they had used a citizen's army to
fight a vicious, brutal, colonial war, and civilians just cannot do that
kind of a thing. For that, you need the French foreign legion, the Gurkhas
or something like that. Every predecessor has used mercenaries, often
drawn from the country that they're attacking like England ran India with
Indian mercenaries. You take them from one place and send them to kill people in the other place. That's the standard way to run imperial wars.
They're just too brutal and violent and murderous. Civilians are not going
to be able to do it for very long. What happened was, the army started
falling apart. One of the reasons that the army was withdrawn was because
the top military wanted it out of there. They were afraid they were not
going to have an army anymore. Soldiers were fragging officer. The whole
thing was falling apart. They were on drugs. And thats why I think that
they're not going to have a draft. That's why I
m in favor of it. If there's going to be an army that will fight brutal,
colonial wars, and that's the only likely kind of war, I
m not talking about the militarization of space and that kind of thing, I
mean ground wars, it ought to be a citizen's army so that the attitudes of
the society are reflected in the military.
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
hmmm,
Fri, Dec 10, 2004 6:07PM
draft daydreams
Fri, Dec 10, 2004 10:33AM
RWF
Thu, Dec 9, 2004 9:13PM
Well said, Richard Estes!
Thu, Dec 9, 2004 7:52PM
more anecdotal evidence that a draft may be necessary
Thu, Dec 9, 2004 5:28PM
several articles have come out in the last couple of days . . . . .
Thu, Dec 9, 2004 4:37PM
of course
Thu, Dec 9, 2004 2:38PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network