top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

UNSF Declaration of Independence

by Josh (inthecity [at] sbcglobal.net)
A concerned group of San Francisco residents has begun the process to put a radical new ballot measure on the November 2nd ballot and we need your help. Join us for a pot-luck meeting this Thursday (May 27th) as we plan how we can get this passed (for location please e-mail me)
The United Neighborhoods of San Francisco
Declaration of Independence

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which their humanity entitles them, a decent respect to the opinions of humankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all people are equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown that people are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

Such has been the patient sufferance of the people of this city; and such is now the necessity which constrains us to alter our former systems of government. The history of the past and present administrations of the United States of America is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the people of this city, these states, and the world. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

The government of the United States of America has refused its assent to that social behavior which is the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

It has through the prosecution of treaties refused to make accommodations for entire nations of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of labor representation, and other rights inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

It has called together policy-making bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the people of its own and other nations, for the sole purpose of conducting business pertaining to the affairs of other peoples in secrecy, absent both their presence and their voice.

It has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing its assent to international law.

It has made judges the selectors of its highest elected office and is itself a government which serves corporations, not its people.

It has created a multitude of new offices in its Department of Homeland Security, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass and spy upon the people.

It has persisted, even in times of peace, in building and developing weapons of the most obscene descriptions and marketing them as a source for profit to nations around the world.

It has created self-admitted shadow governments and various agencies engaged in spying, subterfuge of all kinds, and self-confessed criminal activities including assassinations and the overthrow of the lawful governments of other nations.

It has combined with others to subject peoples throughout the world to a jurisdiction foreign to their constitution and unacknowledged by their laws; giving assent to acts of pretended legislation.

It has deposited toxic materials throughout the earth and within the territory of our own city and has refused to clean up its poisonings here and elsewhere.

It has shielded the criminals in its midst, even from prosecution by international bodies, has violated international conventions, and has refused to join as an equal with other nations in the creation of international bodies and agreements designed to end war crimes, the exploitation of children, and to protect human rights and our common environment.

It has destroyed its own small business people and small farmers while ensuring the health of major corporations through billions of dollars in direct subsidies.

It has used our share of its taxes in ways that we, the citizens of San Francisco, do not support, including the waging of offensive wars.

It has demonstrated a system of justice which is inequitable, racist, and classist as evidenced by the disproportionate numbers of minorities and the poor which inhabit its single growth industry: prisons.

It has transported people across seas to be held without trial for pretended offences.

It has invalidated our decisions in matters of our own sovereign concern, attempted to abolish our most valuable laws, and expresses fundamental hostility to the forms of our society.

It has ignored or suspended our own legislative acts and the actions of our elected officials, declaring itself invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

It is at this time transporting large armies of regular Soldiers and Mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of a civilized nation.

It has constrained sovereign peoples taken captive to betray and bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and neighbors, or to fall themselves by their hands.

Amongst these many general abuses it has suborned and denied the sovereign will of the citizens of the City of San Francisco in five critical ways:

1. Against our firm resolve to not persecute its wars of aggression, it has utilized our taxes for these purposes, recruited the youth of our city to fight in its armies, moved war materials through our port, contaminated our land, and has failed in its acknowledged duty to recover the damages done.

2. Against our decision and progressive implementation of a model system for administering medical marijuana, a plant recognized in providing safe and effective relief from a variety of conditions, and in opposition to the mutual wishes of physicians and patients, it has raided, arrested, and prosecuted individuals and groups acting in full compliance with state and local law.

3. It has chosen to stand against the general desires of the people of San Francisco and the executive action of its Mayor in attempting to limit marriage and its multitude of benefits to heterosexuals to the degree of consideration and proposal of a Constitutional Amendment.

4. In violation of its own Constitution, it has instituted the PATRIOT Act, trampling on the basic rights of due process and privacy, further weakening the already limited freedoms of speech, inquiry, association, and legal representation. Without warrant or witness, crimes against the common citizen can be pursued under the guise of National Security, claiming the name of justice but without evidence of cause. We, the people of San Francisco, have repudiated this act and its administration through the resolution of the Board of Supervisors and the direct vote of the people, instructing non-compliance by city civil servants who are directed to refer PATRIOT act requests to the Board of Supervisors for decision, thereby placing our citizens in grave conflict between performance of just and lawful actions and the illegal actions of a more powerful state which assumes sovereignty over us.

5. As a city that considers itself a member of the international community and supports both universal health care and the International Declaration of Human Rights, the disregard of the United States of America for the welfare of its own people stands in strong contradiction to both our own principles of a just society and to international understandings we share with the remainder of the world.

We, therefore, as representatives of the United Neighborhoods of San Francisco, in general congress assembled, appealing to the peoples of the world and their communities for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of this city, solemnly publish and declare: that these United Neighborhoods are, and of right ought to be, a free and independent city; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the US corporate crown; and that all political connection between them and the United States of America, is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that as a free and independent city, these United Neighborhoods have full power to levy peace, conclude war, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

We instruct the Board of Supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco and all other appropriate legal representatives of this city, to amend the City Charter in all such ways as are required in order to establish and clarify the lawful standing of the United Neighborhood of San Francisco as a sovereign nation per this Declaration and to inform the government of the United States of America of our separate and sovereign status in a timely and appropriate manner.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by saving_public_wry_un (johngimbel [at] charter.net)
Some great points. Historically, they posted the ditty that
you "parrot-to-extents-with-new purpose" and invited a dreadful
fight--by coincidence-won, as history attests.

Perhaps Mr. Bush can be peacefully arrested, as an alternated,and the whole nation go forth on a new note ala (portions of) S.F.'s cry for a rebirthing, here.

To that purpose, I, John Gimbel, remit to arresting officers a document I have reworked, feeling same was needed, that
should give to Mr. Bush more rights in his own arrest than
he ever imparted to others (or at least wake this place a
bit more to the direction needed on something to do with
"rights.")

THE NEW MIRANDA: (by John Gimbel):


1. You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions.

2. Anything you do say may be used against you in a court of law.

ME: (or person under arrest)
The following is what I perenially hold true and
think everyone should have the right and need
to say if and when agreeing to
#2, above: Thus, I should say,
"I have written much and know any first draft
to usually fall short. Same goes
it with oral documentations or speeches.
I reserve the right to amend, correct,
clarify, or additionally explain anything
I've uttered." To #2 I should and must say also
that "I do not agree to any arrangement
which attempts to turn a particular
statement by myself against me in a court
of law. It is because, for the most part, creatures
and the creature man are not designed to be
self-incriminating." And then I may say, "
Knowing my interpretations of 'right' #2, I
am willing to make a statement. Do you
wish to hear it now"?

3. You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the
police and to have an attorney present
during questioning now or in the future.

ME: (or person under arrest)
Were you planning on getting me one just as
soon as I have talked right now? Or days
from now if I should choose silence? How
do your men at your precinct sly this
one?

4. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before
any questioning if you wish.

ME: (or person under arrest)
To disparage me, do you plan to own a
'discretionary' range of periods you may use in which
questioning of me will go forth, say
between right now and 2 weeks from now,
depending on whether you're successfully forcing, tempting or cajoling
me to talk now? IOW's, depending on
whether you like my offer to talk, or
don't, are you're maybe covertly threatening
me (or allowed to 'within the law')
with that I might not see my attorney
for up to 2 weeks? Depending, as your offer would
seem, on when
you decide the questioning will occur? Or whatever?
Or just how ridiculous a wait do you have
in mind if I don't loosen up now?

5. If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present you
will still have the right to stop answering
at any time until you talk to an attorney

ME: (or person under arrest)
See deviltry of original Miranda dealt with in 3 and 4.

6. Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to
you....

End New Miranda

Glad to help.






by mr_bogus_puck (same as wry un)
See, revolutions can be won 'peaceably.' Reagan probably had read these rights coming down on George W. and knew they were coming for him next.

He might have even assisted the effort with suicide. Autopsy
folks test his hemo?

Yiiiihaawww!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$35.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network