top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

San Francisco Makes History in Marriage Equality

by Bill Hackwell (hckwll [at] cs.com)
Over 2,600 same sex marriages took place in San Francisco in defiance of state and federal laws.
g_and_l_marriages_1.jpg
When the City Hall of San Francisco opened its doors on February 12 and started to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples it opened something else as well; a window in history that ushered in the wind that will eventually result in full equality for all relationships regardless of sexual orientation.

The first couple to be married were longtime lesbian activists Phyllis Lyon and Del Martin who have been together for 51 years. Over the next 6 days through the holiday weekend and into Tuesday over 2,600 couples from the Lesbian and Gay Bi and Trans communities were married in civil ceremonies in the city hall rotunda for all the world to see. Long lines of couples accompanied by witnesses, friends and relatives wrapped around City hall many spending the nights waiting in line in rainy weather for the chance to be married in what can only be described as a historic act of mass civil disobedience.

Newly elected San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, a moderate Democrat, feeling pressure from the LGBT community and progressive supporters nation wide directed city officials early Thursday to begin issuing licenses to gay and lesbian couples and the rush was on. Newsom ordered City Hall to stay open over the 3-day weekend and over 200 city administrative workers volunteered their time to allow as many people as possible to be married. On Saturday the mood in the long lines was one of jubilation of finally being able to marry their partners. It was also lost on no one that this indeed was a moment in history towards overcoming institutionalized discrimination when it comes to same sex couples being granted the same rights as heterosexual couples. The process moved slowly but no one seemed to care as they packed inside to the city assessor’s office to take out the marriage license and pay the fees. After that the couples were led to the 4th floor rotunda where deputy commissioners and judges performed the ceremonies for free. While the number of marriages being performed were like an assembly line each ceremony was done with dignity and as much time was given to each couple as was needed. Many of those from out of town who did not have family and friends with them had cell phones so that loved ones could listen in. As many as 85% of those being married were from San Francisco but others came from as far away as South Africa. As married couples left city hall onto Van Ness Avenue, waving their marriage licenses, those waiting in line for their turn would cheer wildly.

San Francisco’s defiance of violating state law that defines marriage as between a man and a woman was immediately challenged in state court by reactionary and homophobic groups like the Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund and the Campaign for California Families who say that the marriage certificates of these 2,000 couples are not worth the paper they are written on. In court on Tuesday morning one court said they were not ready to rule on the issue and put it off until Friday. In Superior Court in the afternoon judge James Warren gave a neutral decision giving the city a non binding ceast and desist order and if it didn't stop issuing licences the city had to come back to court on March 29 (!!!) to explain why it was continuing to issue the licences to same sex couples.

No matter what happens when the struggle for marriage equality ends up back in court a new phase in the struggle for LGBT rights has opened up and there is no going back. After the court rulings Mayor Newsom made a prophetic remark to the media when he said, "I recognize that the path we are on is inevitable and we want to continue on that path until we are forced to stop." How far the city is willing to stand its ground remains to be seen and that will be determined by the strength of the growing groundswell for full rights for same sex couples. One thing for sure is that the genie is out of the bottle.




§Many Couples Came With Their Children
by Bill Hackwell (hckwll [at] cs.com)
g_and_l_marrages_p2.jpg
§Gay Couple With Official Marriage Licence
by Bill Hackwell (hckwll [at] cs.com)
g_and_l_marriages_p3.jpg
§Lesbian Couple Being Married With Their Child
by Bill Hackwell (hckwll [at] cs.com)
g_and_l_marriages_p4.jpg
§Gay Couple With Witnesses
by Bill Hackwell (hckwll [at] cs.com)
g_and_l_marriages_p5.jpg
§Waiting In Line to Be Married
by Bill Hackwell (hckwll [at] cs.com)
g_and_l_marriages_p7.jpg
§Line of Couples Waiting To Be Married On Van Ness
by Bill Hackwell (hckwll [at] cs.com)
g_and_l_mariages_p10.jpg
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by San Franciscan
Where has Bill Hackwell been, hob nobbing with the stinking Democrats, whose sole purpose is to keep the Reds out of office? Is he playing the reactionary lesser evil game too? Does he think being a socialist means promoting fascists like Gavin Newsom? Does he think at all?

Gavin Newsom, the former supervisor from the swanky Marina and Pacific Heights, voted for the fascist PATRIOT Act and for the second Persian Gulf Massacre, better known as the latest blood for oil war in Iraq. His campaign was heavily funded by landlords and realtors as he supported anti-tenant, anti-rent control Prop R in November 2002, and anti-homeless tenants on the November 2002 and November 2003 ballot, with 2 different ballot propositions. He currently has another anti-workingclass, rich-folks-only housing initiative on the March 2004 ballot, Prop J, on which everyone should vote No.

In addition to voting No on J, you should vote No on F, G and Measure 2, and yes on the other San Francisco propositions. On the California ballot, you should vote Yes on 56 and No on all the rest.

As to people, only the Reds (Peace & Freedom) or the Greens at any level of office should be considered as the twin parties of capitalism, the Democrat-Republicans are part of the problem, and have nothing to offer the workingclass.

This gay marriage scene, while it should be supported on principle, is a political football as far as Democrat Newsom is concerned, used to draw voters away from the Reds and Greens, the sole reason for the existence of the Democratic Party.

The next time anyone sees Bill Hackwell, ask him just what they think is so moderate about the most reactionary member of the Board of Supervisors when he was a member and further, what is he doing, as an alleged socialist, praising Gavin Newsom?
by SFBG link
Newsom had already surprised many with several progressive moves, such as calling attention to the persistent neglect of Hunters Point. But this was an unexpectedly activist use of the Mayor's Office, one that's annoyed some Democratic Party leaders and may haunt him as he seeks higher office. Nonetheless, he's been courageous and forceful on the issue, sticking hard to the notion that denying marriage licenses is discrimination, pure and simple.

"I think I speak for many in the gay community when I say that he has won a lifetime supporter and friend," said McKay, who was married Feb. 13.

http://www.sfbg.com/38/21/news_newsom.html
by Don
Would Matt have done this? Who knows.

Newsom scapegoated the poor to get elected but he's a showman and is mainly trying to drum up support from communities that didnt like him during the election. It appears he will be left socially and moderate right economically while in office, but even there its hard to tell since politicians will do many things out of character if it gets votes.

Using the mayor's office to do legal civil disobedience is something I can see Newsom being more willing to engage in the Matt (who would have had to reach out to the moderates once in office and would have been constantly fighting to show that a Green in office could act "responsibly") I bet that Newsom will use moderate left support on gay marriage and maybe even medical marijuana to push a conservative economic agenda, but Newsom really doesnt stand for anything so there is a chance he will ditch the people who got him elected if he thinks it will help him in the long run.
by anon. student
These pictures and the articles do a good job of displaying the love and beauty that was present this weekend. Thanks Newsom, for finally breaking the long chain of discrimination. Some of the most loving and caring people I know are homosexual and it brings tears to my eyes that they can finally be recognized as married, loving couples. Whatever the motives or outcomes of Newsom's ruling are, this weekend was a beautiful display of love and happiness.
by somegirl
great pictures... brings tears to my eyes =::)
by Ben
I really enjoyed your article and photos. Thanks for being an ally! Love you, Ben
by JP
isnt beauty wonderful? a little pain, a lot of joy and whole bunch of fairy dust sprinkled onto the hearts of america. put these in your pipe dubbya.
by KK (breslinkm)
Congrats to the ones that did have same sex weddings if they want to be with the love of thier life congratulations. Where I am from same sex marriages is legal but I hope in Australia same sex marriage should be allowed I mean every where in the world there should be same sex weddings.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$75.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network