top
Anti-War
Anti-War
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Barbara Lee's speech

by FWD:
The words of Rep. Barbara Lee of California, as she offered the sole vote against the use-of-force resolution in the US House of Representatives.
Ms. LEE. Mr. Speaker, I rise today with a heavy heart,
one that is filled with sorrow for the families and
loved ones who were killed and injured in New York,
Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Only the most foolish or
the most callous would not understand the grief that
has gripped the American people and millions across
the world.

This unspeakable attack on the United States has
forced me to rely on my moral compass, my conscience,
and my God for direction.

September 11 changed the world. Our deepest fears now
haunt us. Yet I am convinced that military action will
not prevent further acts of international terrorism
against the United States.

I know that this use-of-force resolution will pass
although we all know that the President can wage a war
even without this resolution. However difficult this
vote may be, some of us must urge the use of
restraint. There must be some of us who say, let's
step back for a moment and think through the
implications of our actions today--let us more fully
understand its consequences.

We are not dealing with a conventional war. We cannot
respond in a conventional manner. I do not want to see
this spiral out of control. This crisis involves
issues of national security, foreign policy, public
safety, intelligence gathering, economics, and murder.
Our response must be equally multi-faceted.

We must not rush to judgment. Far too many innocent
people have already died. Our country is in mourning.
If we rush to launch a counter-attack, we run too
great a risk that women, children, and other non-
combatants will be caught in the crossfire.

Nor can we let our justified anger over these
outrageous acts by vicious murderers inflame prejudice
against all Arab Americans, Muslims, Southeast Asians,
or any other people because of their race, religion,
or ethnicity.

Finally, we must be careful not to embark on an open-
ended war with neither an exit strategy nor a focused
target. We cannot repeat past mistakes.

In 1964, Congress gave President Lyndon Johnson the
power to ``take all necessary measures'' to repel
attacks and prevent further aggression. In so doing,
this House abandoned its own constitutional
responsibilities and launched our country into years
of undeclared war in Vietnam.

At that time, Senator Wayne Morse, one of two lonely
votes against the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, declared,
``I believe that history will record that we have made
a grave mistake in subverting and circumventing the
Constitution of the United States.........I believe
that within the next century, future generations will
look with dismay and great disappointment upon a
Congress which is now about to make such a historic
mistake.''

Senator Morse was correct, and I fear we make the same
mistake today. And I fear the consequences.

I have agonized over this vote. But I came to grips
with it in the very painful yet beautiful memorial
service today at the National Cathedral. As a member
of the clergy so eloquently said, ``As we act, let us
not become the evil that we deplore.''
by Dave (saltaire [at] ix.netcom.com)
Ms. Lee's speech said little, added nothing, and was pointless - except for wistful longings and the seconding of plans already in place (don't rush to judgement, try to avoid killing the innocent, use a multi-faceted approach, etc). September 11th was quite obviously not a "Gulf of Tonkin incident", and her references to the latter are not only irrelevant under the circumstances, they are curiously naiive. Give me workable, concrete alternatives and plans, or a more accurate title for speeches such as hers. Hers could have been called "More Nothing from a California resident with no new alternative approaches, Rep. Barbara Lee".

Had it been a speech sharing her pain and sorrow with the victims, that would have been fine and commendable. But to oppose an important Congressional vote while giving no realistic reasons for the "No", and offering no new alternatives to obliterating terrorism, is simply a waste of her time and everyone else's.

By opposing that particular vote, she became part of the problem.

Dave

by anarchist
Oh, naturally, Dave.

Let me ask you... Gulf of Tonkin did not come out until later. How do you know if this incident is like the Gulf of Tonkin or not?

And second, I think it is obvious that most congressional speeches are pretty meaningless. What is important is that Barbara Lee voted her conscience, rather than being brow-beaten into making what is the "patriotically-correct" decision.
by KKK
Go Back to your true calling...CRACK WHORE. Stop Pretending to be WHITE.
by Nunya
Listen Up KKK. Everytime you make a racist remark.
Can't you feel your cock getting smaller?
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$50.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network