top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Sami Al-Arian Acquitted

by NCA
A jury has acquitted
Professor Sami Al-Arian, a Palestinian American,
on key charges.
December 6, 2005: Sami Al-Arian Acquitted
of Key Charges!

Today is a great victory for our community and
the struggle for justice. A jury has acquitted
Professor Sami Al-Arian, a Palestinian American,
on key charges. Professor Al-Arian now awaits
the decision of the prosecutors on whether or
not to retry him on the deadlocked charges.

The NCA welcomes this significant development.
Professor Al-Arian's determination is an example
of how staying the course of justice alone suffices.
We encourage our community, friends and supporters
to demand his immediate release along with all
those charged with him.

For more information, please go to:
http://www.arab-american.net/Civil_Rights___/al-Arian/al-arian.html

Sincerely,

NCA National Office
email: nationaloffice [at] arab-american.net
phone: 530.756.5548
web: http://www.arab-american.net
§US 'Terror' Evidence No Longer Credible: Experts
by IOL (reposted)
CAIRO, December7 , 2005 (IslamOnline.net) – The acquittal of a US naturalized Palestinian professor by a federal jury of terror charges has questioned the credibility of US "secret intelligence" and restored confidence in the US judiciary, analysts and US Muslim activists said on Wednesday, December7 .

Sami Al-Arian, a Kuwaiti-born Palestinian, was found not guilty Tuesday, December6 , on eight criminal counts related to "terrorist" support, perjury and immigration violations.

Juliette Kayyem, a terrorism legal analyst at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, said the outcome shows that US juries can seriously consider both government accusations of terrorism and any evidence.

"This case has been sort of a tortured case for the United States," Kayyem, a Justice Department official from 1995 to1999 , told the Washington Post.

A male juror said he perceived Arian's acquittal not as a First Amendment issue but as a failure of the government to prove its case.

"I didn't see the evidence," said the man, who declined to give his name.

David Cole, a law professor at Georgetown University, told the New York Times the verdict amounted to a rejection of the government's "sweeping guilt by association theory."

Prosecutors, who had been building a case against Arian for 10 years, relied on some20 , 000hours of taped conversations culled from wiretaps on Arian and his associates.

Officials said he had helped finance and direct "terrorist" attacks in Israel, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, while using his faculty position teaching computer engineering at the University of South Florida as a cover for his "terrorist" activities.

But ultimately, the jury found him not guilty of the charge of conspiring to kill people overseas, and it deadlocked on three of the other most serious terrorism charges.

Justice Department officials said they were considering whether to re-try Arian on the counts on which the jury did not reach verdicts.

Arian is to remain in jail on an immigration matter, but his lawyer said he would probably file a motion next week asking to have him released on bond.

Political Prosecution

"This was a political prosecution from the start, and I think the jury realized that," Linda Moreno, one of Arian's defence lawyers, told the Times.

"They looked over at Sami al-Arian; they saw a man who had taken unpopular positions on issues thousands of miles away, but they realized he wasn't a terrorist. The truth is a powerful thing," he added, referring to Arian's staunch support of the Palestinian cause and harsh criticism for the Israeli practices.

His attorney William Moffitt rested his defence without presenting evidence. In court, he argued that the government sought to muzzle his client's avowed antipathy to Israel.

"This case concerns Dr. al-Arian's right to speak, our right to hear what he has to say and the attempt of the powerful to silence him," he said during the case.

Arian's family members and other three co-defendants -- Sameeh T. Hammoudeh, Ghassan Ballut and Hatim Fariz, who were also acquitted -- wept in court on Tuesday as the verdicts were read.

"Fair Trial"

As for the local Muslim community, Muslims in Florida celebrated the verdict and gathered Tuesday night at the local mosque Arian helped found.

Arian "loves America, and he believes in the system, and thank God the system did not fail him," his wife, Nahla, said outside the federal courthouse as throngs of family members, supporters and lawyers celebrated the justice done to him.

Outside the courtroom, Ahmad Bedier, regional director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), praised the verdict.

"It will not only restore faith in the justice system by American Muslims but also by Muslims all over the world who doubted justice in America," Bedier told the Post.

"This sends a very positive message that Muslims can receive a fair trial in America.

http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2005-12/07/article05.shtml
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$35.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network