top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

UCSC March4 SlideShow

by via Fosco Lives!
The UCSC Admin reports protestors had "clubs and knives." Judge for yourself.
Copy the code below to embed this movie into a web page:
§Press Release
by repost
Thursday, March 4, 2010

University of California, Santa Cruz

UC Santa Cruz students block all access to campus to protest cuts to public education

Students to Sacramento and UC admins: “We strike to restore California’s commitment to public education for all people!”

CALIFORNIA STRIKE! We strike in solidarity with students, workers, teachers, and all Californians who support public education against elected officials and UC administrators who have gutted funding, threatened accessibility, and damaged the quality of California’s education system, from pre-K through community colleges, CSU, and UC.

In order to truly appreciate just how absurd the Regents’ and UCOP’s austerity program at the UC really is, just consider several facts that state and UC leaders would rather you not think too much about:

1. The UC Regents have ultimate control of over $8 BILLION in investments that they’ve chosen not to use to save public education at UC

2. Between 1996 and 2006, UC administrative positions have increased an eye-popping 118% compared to a 34% increase in faculty positions and 33% increase in student enrollment over the same period. There are 3,600 positions in the UC that earn more than $200,000, yet here at UCSC, we’re being told our foreign language instructors must be laid-off, workers must take furloughs, and classes must be eliminated or maxed-out in enrollment to operate more “efficiently.”

3. In the midst of the UC’s financial crisis, UC actually loaned $200 million to California to help cover the state’s budget deficit!

4. Despite UCOP’s resort to high-power media consultants who are trying to convince the public that their celebrated “Blue and Gold” financial aid program will offset the 32% tuition increases, the truth is that the “high tuition, high aid” model that UC is pursuing has a negative affect on accessibility for lower-income students, especially those from under-represented groups, in part because students are more likely to apply to schools based on the published tuition rates, not on how much aid they think they might get.

5. In California, the rich continue to get richer: Governor Schwarzenegger’s “Commission on the 21st Century Economy” baldly proposed in late 2009 an income tax cut for the wealthiest 3% that amounted to $7.5 billion in savings, while the bottom 81% of the population would realize only 10% of the total savings in their “reform” plan. Households with $1 million incomes would save $109,000 in tax cuts, whereas those making between $40,000 and $50,000 would only save $4. This is not a typo.

So it is quite obvious that the cuts to public education in Sacramento are another form of class war by the rich against the middle and lower classes, with a disproportionate burden falling on students of color, workers, and those who can least afford it. The UC Regents, most of whom are counted among California’s super-rich, are dancing to the same tune as Sacramento by protecting UC’s Wall Street investments instead of protecting the system of public education they oversee.

What we want (demands voted on by the March 4th Strike Committee):

From Sacramento:

* Reverse the cuts, lay-offs, and fee hikes—no more cuts to education

* Progressive taxation on the wealthy and corporations to fund education and social services, not war and corporate bail outs

* Reject Schwarzenegger’s plan to fund education by privatizing prisons

From UC system:

* Stop the privatization of education

* Stop the resegregation of education—full funding for student services and support programs, especially for students of color and underrepresented communities

* Democratize education—student, teacher, and worker control in the schools

* Drop all charges against student activists—stop UC and police harassment against activists

March 4 actions:

* Picket lines at all campus entrances from 5 a.m.

* Rallies at the main entrance (Bay and High Streets) at 9 a.m. and noon

* General Assembly at 5 p.m. at the main entrance

Strike blog:

http://slugorganizingcommittee.wordpress.com
§faculty objection to Kliger’s lies
by repost
To: The UCSC Community
From: Some UCSC Faculty (signatures below)

We write to object to CPEVC Kliger’s report issued on Thursday March 4 at 9:50 am regarding the demonstration.


It is true that the demonstration successfully stopped “business as usual” on the UCSC campus. While this may have represented an inconvenience for some, it perhaps bears repeating that no significant social change occurs without some inconvenience.

Many faculty participated in the campus closure, some for the entire day, starting early in the morning. A number of us who were present at the two main entrances and at key intersections throughout the day can say with confidence that metal pipes, clubs, and knives were nowhere to be seen.

Further, the many health care workers who arrived at the two entrances were allowed to enter campus with almost no delay. Indeed, the student organizers had created an orderly and respectful protocol for speaking with people in cars who were attempting to enter the campus. Testament to their understanding of the complexities of choosing to close campus, the strike organizers had made arrangements with Family Student Housing for easy and safe access and egress. Additionally, we did not witness anyone being prevented (by protesters) from leaving the campus.

The students organizing the campus closure also made arrangements for incident monitoring and witnessing. Several received training from the National Lawyer’s Guild; there were also NLG legal observers whose role it was to remain neutral and to document. We hope these observers will attest to the specifics of reported incidents.

Some of us witnessed drivers aggressively trying to break through lines of protesters, a dangerous reaction to peaceful protest that the administration has referred to as “road rage.”

To our knowledge, administrators from Student Affairs were nowhere to be found. Campus administrative leadership was also notably absent.

The event was an impressive example of the ability of our students to educate themselves and others about the state of the California budget and the increasing privatization and corporatization of the UC and public education in California generally. Further, the event demonstrated students’ capacity to build coalitions among various university groups and with other sectors of public education and organized labor, which were represented in the rallies on campus and in downtown Santa Cruz on Thursday.

We think that the administrative leadership of UCSC should recognize the students’ commitment to defend public education in calling attention to the ongoing crisis with a day of public action.

Sincerely,

Jordi Aladro Professor, Literature

Mark Anderson Assistant Professor, Anthropology

Anjali Arondekar Associate Professor, Feminist Studies

Noriko Aso Assistant Professor, History

Gopal Balakrishnan Associate Professor, History of Consciousness

Karen Bassi Professor, Literature and Classics

Hunter Bivens Assistant Professor, Literature

Margaret Brose Professor Emerita, Literature

Giulia Centineo Lecturer, Languages

Alan Christy Associate Professor, History

Vilashini Cooppan Associate Professor, Literature

Cindy Cruz Assistant Professor, Education

Nathaniel Deutsch Professor, History and Literature

Timothy P. Duane Associate Professor, Environmental Studies

Dana Frank Professor, History

Carla Freccero Professor, Literature

Rosa-Linda Fregoso Professor, Latin American and Latino Studies

Ron Glass Associate Professor, Education

Deborah Gould Assistant Professor, Sociology

Chris Hables Gray Lecturer, Crown College

Herman Gray Professor, Sociology

Miriam Greenberg Assistant Professor, Sociology

Jody Greene Associate Professor, Literature

Kirsten Silva Gruesz Professor, Literature

Gildas Hamel SOE Lecturer, History

Donna Haraway Distinguished Professor, History of Consciousness

Christine Hong Assistant Professor, Literature

Emily Honig Professor, History

Sharon Kinoshita Professor, Literature

Norma Klahn Professor, Literature

Regina Langhout Assistant Professor, Psychology

H. Marshall Leicester Professor, Literature

Leslie Lopez Lecturer, Latin American and Latino Studies, Writing

Helene Moglen Professor Emerita, Literature

Juan Poblete Associate Professor, Literature & Provost, Kresge College

Eric Porter Professor, American Studies

Catherine Ramírez Associate Professor, American Studies

Renya Ramirez Associate Professor, American Studies

Craig Reinarman Professor, Sociology

Don Rothman Emeritus SOE Senior Lecturer, Writing

Danilyn Rutherford Associate Professor, Anthropology

Felicity Schaeffer-Grabiel Assistant Professor, Feminist Studies

Zack Schlesinger Professor, Physics

Vanita Seth Associate Professor, Politics

Deanna Shemek Professor, Literature & Provost, Cowell College

Dana Takagi Professor, Sociology

Richard Terdiman Professor, Literature

Megan Thomas Assistant Professor, Politics

Rob Wilson Professor, Literature

Karen Tei Yamashita Professor, Literature

(50)

The undersigned, though not present when these events took place, would like to add their names in support of this letter:

Christopher Connery Professor, Literature

Shelly Errington Professor, Anthropology

Barbara Epstein Professor, History of Consciousness

Susan Gillman Professor, Literature

Gail Hershatter Distinguished Professor, History

Robert Meister Professor of Social and Political Thought

———————————————————–

March 4, 2010

To: UCSC Community

Fr: Campus Provost David Kliger

Re: Update on Campus Protest

Earlier this morning, protest activity at both campus entrances rendered our main campus inaccessible to vehicle traffic. Reports of protesters carrying clubs and knives, smashing a car windshield with a metal pipe, denying a resident of faculty/student housing the right to exit the campus, and keeping a campus health care worker from getting to work, escalated this morning’s protest into behavior that is disruptive, intimidating and destructive.

Behavior that degrades into violence, personal intimidation, and disrespect for the rights of others is reprehensible, and does nothing to aid efforts to restore funding to the university.

These actions should cease. University police, Student Affairs staff, and others are doing their best to manage this situation. In the meantime, we commend members of our community for their patience.

Please continue to check the campus website http://www.ucsc.edu/news_events/protest/03-10/ for updates.

———————————————————–

Message from the Chancellor

As the campus returns to full operations, I want to acknowledge the toll yesterday’s protests took on the campus community and renew our commitment to the students we are here to serve.

Thousands of UCSC students, faculty, and staff were impacted by yesterday’s demonstrations, which were part of a national Day of Action in Support of Public Education. It was a difficult day for many, and I thank you for your patience and understanding.

Many people went to extraordinary efforts yesterday to fulfill myriad aspects of the university’s three-part mission of teaching, research, and public service. Under trying circumstances, faculty and staff made numerous adjustments, and I appreciate their professionalism and flexibility. Ultimately, students bore the real brunt of yesterday’s events, as they were inconvenienced and many were unable to attend their classes.

There’s no question that the state’s reinvestment in public education is critical. I urge you to join me in advocating on behalf of UC Santa Cruz as we refocus our attention on continuing the upward trajectory of this great institution.

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Be Real
What happened to the photos of the protesters that were wearing bandanas to conceal their identities while they committed felony vandalism to three vehicles? One rear window was smashed out with something similar to a metal pipe. Where is that photo? Where is the photo of the protester that punched a student in the face?
by Me too
I am a student who was thre on March 4th to fight for my education. I too witnessed masked protesters surrounding cars and breaking a window. The protesters claimed the driver tried to run them over but that wasn't the case. Several of my friends and I left that area and went to the base of campus to meet up with the more legitimate crowds. Those other protesters ARE scary.
by Chris Hables Gray
As a signer of this faculty letter I want to say we looked into the one case of a broken car window we knew about and it seems that the protesters were not at fault, and the police who were there implicitly agreed with this conclusion for they made no arrests. If there were other cases of violence where protesters were at fault I personally deplore them. As I deplore any physical violence individual protesters might have committed, such as the possibility that a student was hit in the face by a protester. But this remains an unconfirmed report. We do know that the claims the UCSC administration spread through the media that students were armed was an outright lie and I am amazed the administration has still not apologized for this irresponsible attempt to "spin" the media coverage.

Even if there were individual acts of violence committed by a few of the several thousand protesters involved during the day of action those acts were against the policies of the students, faculty and staff who organized the protest and certainly were not supported by the overwhelming majority of the people who took part or the many more who supported it. It is common in such protests for a few individuals to use the cover of masses of more disciplined protesters to work out issues (personal and/or political) of their own. Usually they are young males with something to prove but sometimes they are opponents of the protest (or even police) trying to discredit it. People who sieze on these few incidents to discredit the actions of thousands are intellectually dishonest or incredibly naive, or both.

To the protesters who saw a confrontation they felt was wrong I commend you for continuing to protest and urge you that, perhaps, next time you confront the people you saw who seemed to be violent. This is often as difficult and unpleasant and even dangerous as confronting the authorities but just because someone says they are "on our side" does not mean it is really true and it is certainly not a licence to commit actions that any fool can see hurt the movement in the long run. And, while I understand that some students wore masks fearing administration reprisals I would encourage you to show your faces and confront the whole undemocratic process that is destroying our university. You might pay a price and go to jail or face administration sanctions but the masks do not help in the long run. Try not to be afraid of the consequences of your principles.

And if there were any idiots who actually were violent under cover of this mass nonviolent action I say: This isn't Oaxaca. If you want to street fight "man up" (note the ironic quotes) and go somewhere it might make sense. Or better yet, join the Marines and learn how to use violence effectively and then decide if the kind of revolution you want needs a Marine Corp to make it. My revolution certainly does not.

Chris Hables Gray, Lecturer, Crown College, UCSC
by ~Bradley
educacion-es-derecho_9-1-06.jpg
Chris writes:

"...I am amazed the administration has still not apologized for this irresponsible..."

and then Chris writes:

"...if there were any idiots who actually were violent under cover of this mass nonviolent action I say: This isn't Oaxaca."

What does that mean, Chris? Please explain why you are inserting Oaxaca into this. You clearly have a lot to learn from, and about, Oaxaca. I suggest you retract your ignorant and offensive comment about Oaxaca.

Quinta MegaMarcha SlideShow: Por un Oaxaca Mejor
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/09/07/18306649.php

Oaxaca City SlideShow: Un Pueblo Unido Avanza Sin Partidos
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/08/31/18305143.php

http://bradleystuart.net
http://elenemigocomun.net
by Observer
I don't think the carefully selected and edited collection of stills that comprise this piece are much proof of anything.

The claim of knives and clubs seemed overblown, unless someone was counting the sticks used to hold signs. Of course, those sticks could be used in other ways than to hold signs. It's been known to happen on other protests, other picket lines.

I do notice the pics of the crowd rushing the Volvo at High and Western seem to have vanished. I suspect the cop who witnessed that supposedly hit people and then saw it's windows broken didn't arrest anyone because he was greatly outnumbered by the mob, and because the driver, who was known, didn't hit anyone.
by --
The photo did not "vanish." Your suspicion is baseless.
by Observer
I thought the Volvo photos had also been posted on Indybay; perhaps I was wrong. In jumping on that, poster"--" goes of on a tangent irrelevant to the rest of my post. It's a "tired observation" only because my post isn't one of your cheerleaders.
by Chris Hables Gray
Bradley, I think you misunderstood my comment. I very much support the struggle in Oaxaca and think the people have behaved with discipline and quite correctly in resisting the incredibly corrupt government repression. But while it makes sense to struggle in a specific way in Oaxaca, and Chiapas, that does not mean it makes sense here. I am not a pacifist but do believe that the means we use shape our ends. How could it be otherwise? Sorry I didn't write more clearly. crystal
by mutton mike
No, the picture was here, that story has just moved off the front page. It was very clear, and showed people being knocked all over the place by the car.
by Seriously
You conveniently explain away any responsibility by the protesters for a few bad apples in their midst. You sympathize with them by acknowledging that it can be both difficult and frightening to identify the bad apples, confront them, or get rid of them.

So lets look back in time to March 1 and the protest march regarding racist graffiti on campus. Should not the student body and the administration both be given the same free pass? After all, it was only one bad apple, one moron, scrawling one racist piece of drivel?

....I thought not. The situational use of ethics, forgiveness for error, and accountability which create what I consider a glaring double standard by "activists" in Santa Cruz is apalling, in my opinion.

Another case in point?: All the anarchists protesting for anarchy then turning around and demanding their rights when the cops or administration show up and repercussions begin to be meted out. Pitiful hypocrisy.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$225.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network